Scrum.org

AUGUST 28, 2020

like choosing for Scrum?—?they These norms range from very basic ones, like attending a Daily Scrum every day, to abstract ones like “work together towards a shared goal instead of working on your own tasks” and “delivery small, working bits of product frequently instead of huge chunks occasionally”. Why Is Change Hard?

2012 155

2012 2006 2011 Influencer 155

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 25, 2020

When I started using Scrum as a software developer back in 2007 I noticed that this new ways of working really worked, then I decided to learn more about and I became a Scrum Master in 2012 and in 2015 I started to teach Scrum, overcoming my fear of public speaking. You love this!”. Step one - The interview. .

2017 174

2017 2018 2016 SCRUM 174

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 15, 2018

Last week marked the official announcement from Scrum.org that I’m finally a Professional Scrum Trainer. Some years ago — in 2012 — I experienced my first Professional Scrum Master-class. Some years ago — in 2012 — I experienced my first Professional Scrum Master-class. My journey up to this point.

SCRUM 94

SCRUM 2012 2018 Software Review 94

International Institute for Learning

APRIL 19, 2023

They build on lean-agile thinking, and standard Scrum, Kanban, and DevOps practices. Dean Leffingwell released the first version of SAFe in 2012. Disciplined Agile is methodology agnostic and supports Scrum, Kanban, Program, and continuous delivery lifecycles. They emerged about a decade after the Agile Manifesto.

Agile 59

Agile Cadence Certification Lean 59

Agilemania

DECEMBER 13, 2021

46% of the organizations reported they are inconsistencies in practices and processes. SAFe contains a combination of principles, processes, and best practices that help large organizations in easy adoption of agile frameworks including Lean, Kanban, and Scrum. SAFe involves a 12 step process that shows the way SAFe works-.

Agile 98

Agile Lean Software Review Technical Review 98

Scrum.org

AUGUST 25, 2022

The neurological processes for this are also well-understood. It is very similar to work engagement (Schaufeli & Salanova, 2014), which we also measure in both the Scrum Team Survey and TeamMetrics (as “team morale”). Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2012) provides a great perspective on what creates intrinsic motivation.

Sustainability 183

Sustainability 2015 2014 2013 183

Project Pulse Journal

MARCH 20, 2024

This customization process involves a modification of methodologies and governance structures, transforming project management into a strategic asset as dynamic as the projects it aims to guide. Imagine leading projects that not only meet but exceed expectations, where team morale is high and stakeholder engagement strengthens.

Governance 52

Governance Government Technical Review Software Review 52

Rebel’s Guide to PM

DECEMBER 16, 2016

With big data processing capabilities, your software could sift through the estimates and actuals, and then flag the three team members with the worst record for getting their estimates right so that you can appropriately challenge them. How long can we cruise on the coattails of project successes like London 2012?

2017 150

2017 2015 Technical Review 2012 150

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 6, 2019

Our focus needs to be on improving the flow of work and one excellent business metric is the Flow Efficiency of your process. . We also call this the Business Process Efficiency. usually by reducing the amount of Work-in-Process. Improve their work and their processes, and. Helping Flow Efficiency Emerge.

2012 139

2012 Lean 2015 Initiating 139

Digite

JANUARY 7, 2018

Several good books have been written on Kanban and its application to various business processes, especially to Scrum, since David Anderson published his original Kanban “blue book”. If you want to improve or create the flow in your product development process start with this book! Stop Starting, Start Finishing.

Lean 79

Lean Software Review 2010 2014 79

MPUG

JUNE 26, 2020

Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Nenad Trajkovski’s How to Run Scrum Projects with Project for the Web webinar being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: Hello everyone, and welcome to today’s MPUG webinar, How to Run Scrum Projects with Project for the Web.

SCRUM 59

SCRUM Technical Review PMI 2026 59

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

Project Risk Management: A Combined Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision Tree Approach,” Prasanta Kumar Dey, Cost Engineering , Vol. Lessons Learned from Real World Application of the Bow-Tie Method,” Steve Lewis and Kris Smith, 6 th Global Congress on Process Safety , American Institute of Chemical Engineers, March 22?24,

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

Project Risk Management: A Combined Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision Tree Approach,” Prasanta Kumar Dey, Cost Engineering , Vol. Lessons Learned from Real World Application of the Bow-Tie Method,” Steve Lewis and Kris Smith, 6 th Global Congress on Process Safety , American Institute of Chemical Engineers, March 22?24,

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

This quote demonstrates a lack of understanding of making decisions in the presence of uncertainty and the processes and events that create uncertainty. There is naturally occurring variability from uncontrolled processes. Aleatory uncertainty is expressed as a process variability. First, let's establish a principle.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 3, 2020

Their paper provides useful insights into why the Scrum Framework might be so effective when it comes to managing complex work. Their article inspired me to apply the same insights to Scrum and to extend it with my own. Attention is the process of selectively concentrating on one aspect while ignoring other aspects.

2002 202

2002 SCRUM 2007 2003 202

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 12, 2016

Establish a Zero backlog approach to planning - Scrum creates Sprint Backlog. Highly effective Scrum teams have seven items in Sprint Backlog. Ashkenas, “It’s Time to Rethink Continuous Improvement,” HBR blog [link] (2012). . [3] Jakobsen et al, “Scrum and CMMI – Going from Good to Great: Are you ready-ready to be done-done?”

Agile 61

Agile 2009 2008 2011 61

iZenBridge

OCTOBER 9, 2020

Since 2012, we have trained thousands of professionals and companies across different countries. We assure you that you will get full support throughout the process. What is the difference between Scrum and SAFe? The current PMP® exam content focuses on five domains as the stages of the project lifecycle i.e. Initiating.

PMI 49

PMI Certification 2021 2012 49

The IIL Blog

JULY 19, 2023

The wage and salary activities for the assigned workers were the responsibility of their functional managers and project managers often had very little input if any in the performance review processes. Engagement activities do not end at the completion of the staffing process or shortly thereafter. Schaufeli et al. Liao et al.

2002 78

2002 2023 Leadership 2007 78

Agile Coach

JANUARY 16, 2020

Why I created Certified Practitioner and the feedback I got when asking if people were against certs due to the term, or the process of getting them. When I received my CSM (Certified Scrum Master), CSP (Certified Scrum Pratitioner, and CSPO (Certified Scrum Product Owner), I didn’t need to write a test.

Certification 78

Certification Lean 2012 2014 78

Scrum.org

JUNE 24, 2022

When people first look at the Scrum framework, they often see the roles and the events first. They see only the structure of Scrum; who wears the hats and when. But Scrum and the Agile methodologies it builds on are so much more. Scrum is a great example of a motivation framework. And that makes sense.

SCRUM 188

SCRUM 2002 2006 2007 188

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 15, 2020

We all know that Scrum is a framework, but for instance, imagine Scrum to be a gauntlet that holds all the six infinity gems. If so -what could be its infinity stones that could fit the scrum gauntlet which makes scrum so powerful and inevitable? Let’s explore together powers of the Scrum Infinity Stones!

SCRUM 177

SCRUM Development Team Review 2012 Technical Review 177

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 7, 2023

The lecture triggered many thoughts about the relevance of teaching Agile/Scrum. The first paper was a 2012 study on the tensions with remote (off-shoring) teams (Ramesh et al Ambidexterity in Agile Development ISR2012). Young people at university have some idea about what “Agile” and “Scrum” is. It was a tough ride.

Underperforming Technical Team 163

Underperforming Technical Team Agile SCRUM 2012 163

Herding Cats

JULY 9, 2017

The findings in this document are extracted by looking for correlations between decisions or behaviors (keeping teams stable, setting your team sizes to between five and nine, keeping your work in process— WiP—low, etc.) The Performance Index of #Noestimates in the chart above shows differences from Scrum and Lightweight Scrum.

2006 37

2006 Estimate 2012 2014 37

Runrun.it

JANUARY 23, 2020

They discovered that their customers really didn’t care much about banks and that most banking processes were simply a hindrance to helping them get what they want. DBS’s secret lay in turning their processes invisible, so that their customers can make financial transactions as effortlessly as possible.

Technical Review 26

Technical Review 2012 Lean Retail 26

nTask

SEPTEMBER 16, 2019

Newbies’ Guide to Scrum Project Management 101. On that note, I can say that we apply this method in Agile project management through Scrum meetings. . Work is a Multistep Process: Since I have been repeatedly mentioning Prince2 methodology variables in a controlled environment, work is also part of that entire philosophy.

Prince2 68

Prince2 Certification 2019 Controlling 68

Scrum.org

APRIL 7, 2022

Each post discusses scientific research that is relevant to our work with Scrum and Agile teams. Edmondson (2012) argues that dynamic teaming is important to share and encourage learning. This is also what inspired Edmondson (2012) in her academic work on “teaming”. This post is my attempt to do this.

Underperforming Technical Team 168

Underperforming Technical Team 2007 2006 2009 168

Scrum.org

AUGUST 17, 2020

See how approaches like the Scrum Framework and Liberating Structures can prevent some of these biases by bringing in diverse voices and by validating your assumptions against reality. For me personally, it's one of the reasons why I like the Scrum Framework , as it gives guide-rails to help us think and validate our assumptions with data.

2015 221

2015 2014 2004 Influencer 221

MPUG

DECEMBER 3, 2021

Edwards currently offers a library of like 50 plus courses focusing on the fields of project management, systems engineering, leadership, business process improvement, and cybersecurity. I shepherd that and our suite of policies and processes, as well I’m the quality assurance manager. I have used silent brainstorming.

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Risk Management 52

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 2, 2018

Have you ever tried to kickstart a “Scrum of Scrums” in an organization? I suppose a Scrum of Scrums is a bit like a start-up: there has to be a real value proposition. Of course, using a canvas like this for a Scrum of Scrums would be rather artificial, since the event doesn’t really constitute a market offering.

Governance 135

Governance Government Lean Sustainability 135

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 23, 2021

Each post discusses scientific research that is relevant to our work with Scrum and Agile teams. And in that analogy, refactoring is the process by which that debt is repaid. 2012, Li & Shatnawi, 2007). Code metrics for a part of the code for the Scrum Team Survey as generated by Visual Studio 2019. Why do software teams?

Software Review 183

Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 2015 183

Herding Cats

APRIL 4, 2019

Foundations of Risk Management, 2nd Edition, Terje Aven, John Wiley & Sons, 2012. Agile Risk Management and Scrum , Alan Moran, Institute for Agile Risk Management, 2014. Project Risk Management: Process, Techniques, and Insights , 2nd Edition, Chris Chapman and Stephen Ward, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

Risk Management 43

Risk Management Risk 2003 2011 43

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Management Processes (#MP). While many of the presentations have similar titles, the content is focused on a specific set of processes and practices, while the principles are the same, since they are Immutable. . Management Processes. Project Success Assessment - A checklist for assessing the processes for project success.

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

MPUG

MAY 18, 2022

So I just want to let you know that the only drawback, real life drawback, is that they really haven’t updated this since about 2012. A lot of people don’t like that, but whatever your scrum team decides to do is right for your team. It is a point system in the process and I think that that’s okay.

Agile 59

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Cadence 59

Wrike

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

Having a knowledge transfer process in place boosts the chance of project success by over 20%. [6]. Most Popular Agile Tools and Processes: Scrum – 43%. Poor purchasing processes: 23%. 18% use word processing documents. 53% of respondents say they have a project portfolio management process in place. [6].

2015 60

2015 Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 60

Herding Cats

JUNE 12, 2018

Principle #1 - Trust Your Process, or Change Your Process. This is simply good process development and management. What is the Root Cause of the process not being trusted? Or are you taking observations and deciding that the process is broken without finding the actual cause of the undesirable outcomes?

Underperforming Technical Team 40

Underperforming Technical Team Software Engineering Estimate Software Developers 40

Herding Cats

JUNE 12, 2018

Principle #1 - Trust Your Process, or Change Your Process. This is simply good process development and business management. What is the Root Cause of the process not being trusted? This, of course, is simply poor process improvement and a fallacy, since without the root cause the symptom cannot be fixed and will return.

Underperforming Technical Team 28

Underperforming Technical Team Software Engineering Estimate Development Team Review 28

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

So start here to build your academic foundation, that can be put to work to build a foundation of validated experience of making estimates in the presence of uncertainty and protect yourself from fallacious claims that estimates are a waste, not needed, and produce bad resulting in the decision making process for those paying you to produce value.

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40