nTask

OCTOBER 4, 2018

Beginning from the Waterfall model, today multiple approaches are used by software development teams all over the world for more streamlined work with more control of the project flow and deliverables. Customer satisfaction is also more likely due to encouraged involvement throughout the project development life cycle.

SCRUM 113

SCRUM Agile Software Review Technical Review 113

Leading Agile

JUNE 7, 2018

In this installment, we’ll test-drive the first thin vertical slice of application functionality. Review the Story. We were just about to start test-driving our application. Let’s review our first Story before we proceed: blog-ci-cd-pipeline-cloud-3.html. Now we’re going to do software development work.

Software Review 65

Software Review Technical Review 2018 Software Developers 65

Binfire

APRIL 7, 2017

The Agile project management methodology has been used in the software development and IT industry for the past sixteen years, but recently it has gained wide acceptance by many number of industries and organizations. Due the incremental and iterative nature of Agile, the project is divided into smaller phases or iterations.

Agile 100

Agile Technical Review Software Review Development Team Review 100

Binfire

AUGUST 27, 2017

Until recently some academics and Project Management Institute (PMI) considered Agile method, not a serious contender in project management due to the fact that is very hard to set a due date for project’s completion in the Agile method. But due to the short duration of each iteration, the deadline is at most weeks away.

Agile 97

Agile Technical Review Software Review Development Team Review 97

Leading Agile

APRIL 15, 2019

Many software developers will tell you it takes between 10 and 20 minutes to get back into the zone, depending on the task. Note that even given a natural ability to juggle two things, as a practical matter you only have the capacity to handle one work-related thing at a time with due focus and effectiveness.

Software Review 112

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Lean Technical Review 112

Leading Agile

JUNE 8, 2018

In Part 2 we configured our version control, dependency management, and run management facilities and started to get familiar with our development environment. In Part 3 , we test-drove the initial thin vertical slice of our application. We did the application development work in Part 3. Conclusion.

Software Review 63

Software Review Technical Review Infrastructure Software Developers 63

Leading Agile

AUGUST 27, 2018

Over the years, software development tools have grown in complexity and in system resource consumption. What would a minimal, yet functional development environment look like? Before getting into that, let’s review the pros and cons of IDEs. I rarely use a debugger, as I’m one of “those TDD people.”

Software Review 51

Software Review Technical Review 2017 Software Developers 51

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

Effort Distribution to Estimate Cost in Small to Medium Software Development Project with Use Case Points,” Putu Linda Primandari and Sholiq, The Third Information Systems International Conference, Procedia Computer Science, 72, pp. Software Development Effort Estimation using Fuzzy Bayesian Belief Network with COCOMO II,” B.

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

Leading Agile

JULY 4, 2018

These tools have configuration files that have to be set up and, in the case of guard, initialization that has to be done to enable certain features. ZenTest and guard are specifically intended to support Ruby application development. That initial execution of sbt downloads dependencies and gets things set up for using sbt.

Software Review 49

Software Review Technical Review Monitoring Executing 49

Leading Agile

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

Because the recovery phase was not officially recognized (typically due to time reporting rules that prohibited honesty regarding overtime), management missed the opportunity to learn from experience and repeated the death march pattern again and again. Survival is the best the teams can hope for. Stable Team.

Agile 94

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review 94

Workamajig

JANUARY 11, 2021

Authorization Points: Specific points during the course of a project at which the sponsor reviews the business case and approves the project onwards. All decisions about reviewing, approving, and rejecting changes to a project are handled by the Change Control Board. The Client Brief is instrumental for kicking off the project.

Underperforming Technical Team 78

Underperforming Technical Team Project Life Cycle Estimate Risk Management 78

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category and the code for claiming today’s session is on the screen now.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40

Leading Agile

AUGUST 29, 2018

There are more than a few special situations that call for specialized development tools, and a generalized and minimal Vim-based development setup will not support them adequately for professional work. Here are a few that I recognized in the course of this exercise. R — recommend RStudio. General notes.

Software Review 51

Software Review Application Development Software Developers Software Development 51

MPUG

MAY 6, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI, PDU in the technical category, and the code for claiming that with PMI is on the screen now. Technology is wonderful.

Performance Measurement 52

Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Governance 52