Leading Agile

OCTOBER 22, 2018

In the 1960s, it was considered a baseline good practice in software engineering to test your code as you wrote it. The pioneers of software development in that era were proponents of various levels of testing; some advocated “unit” testing and some didn’t, but all recognized the importance of testing code.

Software Review 75

Software Review Infrastructure Engineering Executing 75

Leading Agile

APRIL 15, 2019

At a larger scale, a software delivery organization should limit the number of projects in flight concurrently, and strive to “stop starting and start finishing,” as David Anderson put it. In Lean terms, what you’re experiencing in those games (and possibly in your real work, too) is a high level of work-in-process or WIP.

Software Review 112

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Lean Technical Review 112

nTask

OCTOBER 4, 2018

Beginning from the Waterfall model, today multiple approaches are used by software development teams all over the world for more streamlined work with more control of the project flow and deliverables. Customer satisfaction is also more likely due to encouraged involvement throughout the project development life cycle.

SCRUM 113

SCRUM Agile Software Review Technical Review 113

Rebel’s Guide to PM

JANUARY 7, 2019

These past few years have seen an incredible evolution in the way software is built. In these next years, we’re going to see a new wave of what software can do with the growing capabilities of machine learning, artificial intelligence and data pipelines across enterprises. Mike Clayton. Mike Clayton. Monica Borrell. Robin Burk.

2019 292

2019 Technical Review PMO Consulting 292

Planview

OCTOBER 8, 2020

Regardless of the industry, companies will continue to be affected by different changes due to global competition, new legislation, or other factors. While standards and process centers of excellence will need centralized definition and structure, self-directed teams and the distributed nature of work will force a different way of operating.

PMO 78

PMO Technical Review Software Review Development Team Review 78

Leading Agile

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

It’s time now to move forward to the next level of proficiency in software delivery; what we might call “post-Agile.” I’d like to consider the following in this post: Sustainable Pace. Sustainable Pace. How can the same principle be a good idea in 2002 and a bad idea in 2019? What has changed?

Agile 94

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review 94

Workamajig

JANUARY 11, 2021

Acceptance Test: A process through which a project's end users run through the project to identify any potential issues before it can be formally accepted. Activity ID: An alphanumeric code used to identify an activity. Acquisition Process: The process for acquiring the resources and people needed to complete a project.

Underperforming Technical Team 78

Underperforming Technical Team Project Life Cycle Estimate Risk Management 78

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 29, 2017

This document outlines an approach to support program and project teams in developing effective integrated execution plans for weapons systems and subsystems and component acquisition, modification, and sustainment. Most IMPs in development programs include Events for major design reviews such as PDR or CDR.

Planning 42

Planning Software Review Governance Government 42

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category and the code for claiming today’s session is on the screen now.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40