Remove 2011 Remove Prince2 Remove Software Development Remove Study
article thumbnail

Risk Management Resources

Herding Cats

“A Taxonomy of Threats for Complex Risk Management,” Centre for Risk Studies, Research Programme of the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies, University of Cambridge, Judge Business School, June 2014. “A IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 5, September/October 2011. 3, March 2002. 3, March 2002. 255, April 2010.

article thumbnail

A Compendium of Risk Management Resources

Herding Cats

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Misunderstanding Making Decisions in the Presence of Uncertainty

Herding Cats

“Quantifying Uncertainty in Early Lifecycle Cost Estimation (QUELCE),” Robert Ferguson, Dennis Goldenson, James McCurley, Robert Stoddard, David Zubrow, and Debra Anderson, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2011-TR-026 ESC-TR-2011-026. Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E.

2003 46
article thumbnail

Top Solutions to Project Failure – Epicflow Research Part 2

Epicflow Blog

Merrow (Wiley, 2011), recommended by Giorgio Locatelli , an Associate Professor of Infrastructure Procurement and Management at the University of Leeds. Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering by Robert L. We would like to thank all participants in this study and wish them successful projects, involved teams, and pleasurable work!

article thumbnail

Complete Collection of Project Management Statistics 2015

Wrike

Browse this collection of project management statistics collected from studies and reports from the past five years. 3% use PRINCE2. [4]. earned an average of 16% more (approximately $14,500 ) than their non-credentialed peers in 2011. [6]. Paper-based self-studies – 16%. Popular Methodologies: 41% use PMBoK.

2015 60