Scrum.org

SEPTEMBER 19, 2022

You can sign up here for the ‘Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter and join 35,000-plus subscribers. ?? Professional Scrum Master Training w/ PSM I Certificate — Live Virtual Class: October 4-5, 2022. ?? ?? ???? Retrospective : Inspects the Sprint at the team level, the Definition of Done, and creates improvements. Empiricism.

2020 194

2020 2022 SCRUM Cadence 194

Project Pulse Journal

APRIL 15, 2024

By: Hajime Estanislao, PMP, CSM The quest for methodologies that offer efficiency and agility has never been rockier. Agile methodologies stand at the forefront of this quest, providing the blueprint for rapid, responsive, and customer-centric project execution. Agile methodologies offer a path to mastering these challenges.

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review Agile SCRUM 52

Project Pulse Journal

APRIL 8, 2024

Each approach establishes the development of project deliverables as influenced by the delivery cadence, defined as the number and timing of deliveries based on the type of deliverable. Implementing these methods enables projects to adapt their pace and rhythm to meet evolving needs and deadlines in each phase.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Cadence Development Team Review Technical Review 52

Project Pulse Journal

MARCH 22, 2024

Embrace agile methodology and structured approaches, build a support network, and invest in professional development to enhance your project management skills and capabilities and drive project success. These functions are integral across domains, such as business operations, digital transformation, and agile projects.

Governance 52

Governance Government Technical Review Initiating 52

Scrum.org

JUNE 6, 2022

Learn how individual incentives and outdated organizational structures — fostering personal agendas and local optimization efforts — manifest themselves in Scrum stakeholder anti-patterns that easily impede any agile transformation to a product-led organization. ???? Update : Join the poll and its lively discussion on LinkedIn. ??

SCRUM 201

SCRUM Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Agile 201

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Deshalb habe ich bereits 2017 eine erste Umfrage zum Net Promoter Score® des Scaled Agile Framework SAFe ® durchgeführt. Viereinhalb Jahre später habe ich diese Umfrage nun wiederholt: SAFe® hat zwischenzeitlich mehrere Iterationen durchlaufen und mehr agile Praktiker haben Erfahrungen mit diesem Framework gesammelt. Zwischen dem 13.

Lean 180

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 180

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

SAFe® has always been a controversial topic within the agile community. Therefore, back in 2017, I ran a first survey on the Net Promoter Score® of the Scaled Agile Framework SAFe®. Executive Summary : SAFe®’s NPS® score based on the 2022 sample equals -56. The result back then was -52. For details, see the data below.). ??

Lean 148

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 148