Digite

MARCH 17, 2017

The 10 week PI ends with PI System Demo where the work delivered during the PI is showcased to the stakeholders. (It As the PI has 5 iterations with multiple teams working in cadence to achieve a common vision, it is important for these teams to assemble and plan out the course of action for the entire PI duration.

Planning 60

Planning Engineering Cadence Risk Management 60

Digite

MARCH 2, 2018

It is then up to them – or some business function like sales or support – to have the conversation with your customers that they need to accept new releases at a certain frequency or they may be at a risk of not getting the support they might need on an old version of the product.

Underperforming Technical Team 71

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Cadence Software 71

Digite

MARCH 2, 2018

It is then up to them – or some business function like sales or support – to have the conversation with your customers that they need to accept new releases at a certain frequency or they may be at a risk of not getting the support they might need on an old version of the product.

Software Review 66

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Cadence Software 66

Digite

FEBRUARY 13, 2018

In this article, he outlines the similarities of the two as WIP Limiting, Pull-based systems – with cadences and a focus on learning – while also explaining their differences. A question that I often get while speaking with people is: What is the difference between Kanban and Scrum? You will enjoy this excellent article.

Cadence 94

Cadence SCRUM Lean Underperforming Technical Team 94

Leading Answers

NOVEMBER 1, 2020

So, the responsible thing to do is to agree upfront on how everyone will be kept informed of the project’s progress, risks, issues, etc. Demos  – Having the team demonstrate increments of functionality at the end of every iteration shows what the project has achieved to date. Let’s examine a few….

Agile 135

Agile Planning Underperforming Technical Team Development Team Review 135

Planio

NOVEMBER 11, 2020

The official Scrum Guide describes a sprint retrospective as: A meeting held at the end of a sprint where the Scrum Team can inspect itself and create a plan for future improvements to systems, processes, and workflows. Improvements to processes like your daily scrum. Any full team meeting runs the risk of going off the rails.

Underperforming Technical Team 135

Underperforming Technical Team Development Team Review SCRUM Risk Management 135

Workamajig

JANUARY 11, 2021

Accept: A response to a project risk where the project manager accepts the risk and takes no action to evade it, i.e. 'accepting' the risk. This is usually in case of risks that are unlikely to occur or minor enough so as to not affect the project's outcome. A project sponsor can request an audit.

Underperforming Technical Team 78

Underperforming Technical Team Project Life Cycle Estimate Risk Management 78

MPUG

OCTOBER 16, 2019

As always let me actually share my screen, it makes more sense if you can actually see what we have going up on both the live demo today and also some of the details that we go through here. And then I’m going to do a live demo. You’re going to see this coming out at a very fast cadence.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Engineering 40

Agilemania

MAY 17, 2021

The organizations start with few teams initially, and it is easier to follow simple & lightweight frameworks like Scrum or Kanban at this stage. The most important skills for an agile coach include: Strong understanding of Scrum and Kanban. Experience as a Scrum master or with the agile methodology. Scrum@Scale.

Agile 98

Agile Lean SCRUM Development Team Review 98

Agilemania

MAY 17, 2021

The organizations start with few teams initially, and it is easier to follow simple & lightweight frameworks like Scrum or Kanban at this stage. The most important skills for an agile coach include: Strong understanding of Scrum and Kanban. Experience as a Scrum master or with the agile methodology. Scrum@Scale.

Agile 84

Agile Lean SCRUM Development Team Review 84