Leading Answers

MARCH 7, 2019

Approaches like lean, kanban and agile work well in these uncertain, high-change environments. Digital projects—which manipulate intangible data and algorithms—have no production phase since the process of turning code into executable software (the process of compiling code) is automated.

Software Review 101

Software Review Technical Review Risk Management Software Developers 101

Agilemania

MARCH 19, 2021

Scrum is founded on empiricism and lean thinking. Lean thinking reduces waste and focuses on the essentials. Software Development. Lean Manufacturing. Sprint Review. If the Product Owner or Scrum Master are actively working on items in the Sprint Backlog, they participate as Developers. Daily Scrum.

SCRUM 98

SCRUM Lean Software Review Cadence 98

Digite

MARCH 1, 2017

I was learning several new concepts including Lean, Agile, Application Lifecycle Management (ALM), Project Program Management, etc. I was already aware of Lean principles and their techniques because I got Lean certified in my previous company. We review our work with the Head of Marketing on twice-a-week basis.

Software Review 60

Software Review Lean Cadence Engineering 60

Digite

JUNE 13, 2018

Anderson best articulated its application to software development, in 2013, in the foundational book Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business, and its adoption hasn’t been as universal as Scrum’s during the early days of Agile software development. Creating Your First Kanban Board.

Agile 110

Agile Technical Review Cadence Software Review 110

Agilemania

FEBRUARY 22, 2021

Scrum is founded on empiricism and lean thinking. Lean thinking reduces waste and focuses on the essentials. Software Development. Lean Manufacturing. Sprint Review. If the Product Owner or Scrum Master are actively working on items in the Sprint Backlog, they participate as Developers. Daily Scrum.

SCRUM 52

SCRUM Lean Software Review Cadence 52

Digite

FEBRUARY 7, 2018

Software teams frequently manage products – and that means they are expected to build new features for the product as well as fix defects reported in the product. Frequently, especially in a Scrum environment, it can be difficult to match the cadence of doing both. This is a very common situation! Not Scrum OR Kanban.

Underperforming Technical Team 117

Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM Software Review Cadence 117

Digite

MARCH 2, 2018

So, it really depends on the business context rather than the development and delivery method being followed. From the questioner’s post, it is not clear if their team is doing production support or software/ app dev. On the one hand, there is the problem of high or unpredictable incoming demand on a software team from their customers.

Underperforming Technical Team 71

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Cadence Software 71

Digite

MARCH 2, 2018

So, it really depends on the business context rather than the development and delivery method being followed. From the questioner’s post, it is not clear if their team is doing production support or software/ app dev. On the one hand, there is the problem of high or unpredictable incoming demand on a software team from their customers.

Software Review 66

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Cadence Software 66

Scrum.org

JANUARY 10, 2021

TL;DR; Without working software, you can’t build trust and you don’t know when you will get the next piece of working software. Once you accept this, and quality becomes non-negotiable, your Dev e lopers can focus on creating usable increments of working software. Professional Developers create working software.

Software Review 227

Software Review Technical Review Planning Manufacturing 227

Digite

FEBRUARY 13, 2018

Dave is a Principal Consultant at Depth Consulting Ltd, and Program Director of the KCP Program at the Lean Kanban University. In this article, he outlines the similarities of the two as WIP Limiting, Pull-based systems – with cadences and a focus on learning – while also explaining their differences. Increments.

Cadence 94

Cadence SCRUM Lean Underperforming Technical Team 94

Leading Agile

AUGUST 19, 2020

So the first lens or the first set of foundational things that we’re going to talk about when it comes to predictability is the idea of the three things, teams, backlogs, working tested software. They deliver it, they review it with the product owner, product owner says yes, and then they get to claim the points, right?

Agile 102

Agile SCRUM Governance Government 102

Wrike

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

It is especially useful in software development and enterprise product management as these teams tackle projects and programs on extended timelines with continuous improvements, upgrades, and iterations released and delivered to customers over time. What is the Scaled Agile Framework?

Agile 36

Agile Development Team Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 36

Planio

APRIL 24, 2023

Updating project management software to keep their team on track 9. Learn from their mistakes and lean on them for insights. If you’re working on a complex IT project, you can lean on more detailed techniques such as the Critical Path Method or PERT to provide more granularity. Creating actionable project plans 5.

Development Team Review 78

Development Team Review 2030 Underperforming Technical Team Risk Management 78

Leading Agile

JANUARY 21, 2021

So it’s like the ability to form teams, the ability to create clear backlogs the ability to get to a working tested increment of software at the end of every sprint. So again, I’m anchoring not on feature level agility that we often talk about when it comes like agile software development but how do I pivot an organization?

Sustainability 111

Sustainability Agile SCRUM Technical Review 111

Digite

MARCH 12, 2018

In my over 25+ years in the software industry, this has been an all too familiar situation! I have often wondered – doesn’t speak too well of us as software professionals! Far too many projects and teams are occupied by far too many crises all through the development/ implementation lifecycle.

Development Team Review 154

Development Team Review Software Review Cadence Technical Review 154

Planio

AUGUST 1, 2022

For most development teams and startups, ‘becoming Agile’ starts and ends with how you build software. But a full Agile transformation isn’t just about the development process you use — it’s a way to bring creativity, innovation, and lean operations to every aspect of your business.

Agile 78

Agile Technical Review Leadership Infrastructure 78

Leading Agile

AUGUST 22, 2018

Let’s say that on average stakeholders request a couple of large items, a couple of medium-sized ones, and five small ones in any given cadence, iteration, release, or whatever unit of time your organization uses for such matters. In a typical cadence, stakeholders ask you to complete 12.5 things, and you agree.

Underperforming Technical Team 83

Underperforming Technical Team Cadence Technical Review Software Review 83

Leading Agile

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

It’s time now to move forward to the next level of proficiency in software delivery; what we might call “post-Agile.” Today, some of the same principles seem to present impediments or unnecessary challenges for many teams and organizations. How can the same principle be a good idea in 2002 and a bad idea in 2019?

Agile 116

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review 116

Workamajig

JANUARY 11, 2021

Activity ID: An alphanumeric code used to identify an activity. The agile approach is usually used in software projects where the scope is not always known and adaptability is prioritized. Projects might additional calendars as well to show resource availability, communication cadence, etc.

Underperforming Technical Team 78

Underperforming Technical Team Project Life Cycle Estimate Risk Management 78

Leading Agile

AUGUST 20, 2018

An unattended software delivery pipeline frees technical staff to spend more time on value-add activities rather than tediously performing repetitive tasks by hand, such as. Reviewing code by eyeballing it to ensure compliance with coding standards. Handling merges of code changes made by more than one person.

Software Review 78

Software Review Software Technical Review Development Team Review 78

MPUG

JUNE 1, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s PMI activity code, I’ll have up on the screen here in a minute. As I was introduced, I was a software and programming instructor for many years.

PMI 59

PMI Software Review Estimate Risk Management 59