2002 2019 Leadership SCRUM 
International Institute for Learning
JULY 7, 2022
2009), include eXtreme Programming (XP) (Beck and Fowler, 2001) and Scrum (Schwaber and Beedle, 2002). The Agile Innovation allows teams to launch new products quickly and at a lower risk than with traditional innovation practices (Kerzner, 2019). . Agile Scrum Belgique Blog; [link]. August 2002). July 2013).
The IIL Blog
JULY 19, 2023
If a worker was unhappy with an assignment or the leadership provided by the project manager, they knew that all projects eventually must come to an end, and they would move on to another assignment that could be more challenging and interesting. Engagement activities do not end at the completion of the staffing process or shortly thereafter.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Planio
JULY 22, 2020
Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time. The best books for crafting your leadership qualities. True North: Discover Your Authentic Leadership. The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time. 20 Minute Manager: Managing Projects.
Leading Agile
FEBRUARY 11, 2019
When I first learned about Agile methods in 2002, the principles seemed to offer an ideal solution to many organizational issues common at the time. How can the same principle be a good idea in 2002 and a bad idea in 2019? Zombie Scrum describes the impact on delivery teams. What has changed?
Leading Answers
JANUARY 1, 2019
2019 marks the 25 year anniversary of Scrum and DSDM. I was involved in the creation of DSDM in 1994 and was an early adopter of Scrum and FDD shortly afterward. I would feel wrong evangelizing the singular view of Scrum as the way, or role of the Scrum Master to spread Scrum. Quarter Century.
International Institute for Learning
SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
For instance in the Agile Scrum Methodology [4] it is recommended to have 10 or fewer people in a team. In general, just to simplify and generalize, two Leadership approaches are possible: Autocratic and Democratic. The Autocratic Leadership style should not be perceived as something necessarily negative. Schwaber, K.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content