International Institute for Learning

APRIL 19, 2023

They offer practitioners tools to extend and mature their agility beyond the team to programs and the broader enterprise. DA was developed in 2011 by Scott Ambler and Mark Lines and is based on Scott’s work at Rational Software and IBM. To coordinate the teams, SAFe applies cadence and synchronization.

Agile 59

Agile Cadence Certification Lean 59

Leading Answers

MARCH 7, 2019

Digital projects—which manipulate intangible data and algorithms—have no production phase since the process of turning code into executable software (the process of compiling code) is automated. The development team wants interesting work using new technology and skills to further their craft.

Software Review 101

Software Review Technical Review Risk Management Software Developers 101

Planio

AUGUST 9, 2021

How do Agile teams create a project schedule? What is the best project scheduling software to use? Planio: Best for teams of all sizes (Agile and traditional). Monday.com: Best for non-technical teams. Then, break those down into smaller steps, so your team doesn’t feel overwhelmed. Who’s going to do it?

Software Review 78

Software Review Technical Review Estimate Agile 78

Scrum.org

JANUARY 10, 2021

TL;DR; Without working software, you can’t build trust and you don’t know when you will get the next piece of working software. Once you accept this, and quality becomes non-negotiable, your Dev e lopers can focus on creating usable increments of working software. Professional Developers create working software.

Software Review 227

Software Review Technical Review Planning Manufacturing 227

Leading Agile

AUGUST 19, 2020

And then what’s really fascinating as we’ve gone deeper into this Elevate Agile conversation that Tim talked about a little bit earlier, and we’re really talking to executives about what they care about, we start to get into things, what I might call, strategic alignment, right?

Agile 87

Agile SCRUM Governance Government 87

Planio

APRIL 24, 2023

Assessing and mitigating project risks 7. Updating project management software to keep their team on track 9. Execution & monitoring: With the plan in place, it’s time to start delivering. Testing & handoff: Once the execution is complete, the project manager oversees the testing/quality assurance before launch.

Development Team Review 78

Development Team Review 2030 Underperforming Technical Team Risk Management 78

Digite

FEBRUARY 13, 2018

In this article, he outlines the similarities of the two as WIP Limiting, Pull-based systems – with cadences and a focus on learning – while also explaining their differences. Both methodologies believe in delivering software incrementally to maximize the opportunity to get feedback and capture ROI. Cheers, Mahesh Singh.

Cadence 94

Cadence SCRUM Lean Underperforming Technical Team 94

Wrike

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

When it comes to managing teams and projects effectively, managers can choose from many project management frameworks and methodologies. The Scaled Agile Framework is an Agile framework methodology designed to manage and execute large, complex projects. What is the Scaled Agile Framework? Think of your favorite mobile apps (e.g.,

Agile 36

Agile Development Team Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 36

Planio

AUGUST 1, 2022

For most development teams and startups, ‘becoming Agile’ starts and ends with how you build software. But a full Agile transformation isn’t just about the development process you use — it’s a way to bring creativity, innovation, and lean operations to every aspect of your business.

Agile 78

Agile Technical Review Leadership Infrastructure 78

MPUG

DECEMBER 28, 2020

It’s less prescriptive and seems to be intended for a wider audience group, particularly non-software users. Strategy execution is the downstream of culture. Culture is the downstream of human, team, or organizational values. The new guide clearly informs that Sprint Reviews should not be considered “gates” for releasing value.

Cadence 116

Cadence SCRUM 2020 Agile 116

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Agile Software Development (#ASD). Enterprise IT and Embedded Systems (#EIT).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

Leading Agile

MARCH 17, 2021

This is Mike Cottmeyer's talk from AgileIndy 2021 on The Executive's Guide to Why Agile Transformation Fails. ” – Okay, so we’re gonna talk about today is this thing I call “Executives Guide to Why Agile Transformations Fail.” What about, well, they want to do a dev ops transformation? Transcript.

2021 62

2021 Agile Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM 62

MPUG

OCTOBER 16, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the code for claim that is on the screen now, that’s mpugwebnlearn091819.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Engineering 40

Scrum.org

SEPTEMBER 19, 2020

Stakeholder communication: It is simply not enough for an agile product development organization to create great code and ship the resulting product like a clockwork. There are plenty of opportunities for stakeholders to interact responsibly with a Scrum Team. The two formal Scrum events that come to mind are: Sprint Reviews.

Technical Review 186

Technical Review Software Review Development Team Review Cadence 186

Leading Agile

AUGUST 20, 2018

An unattended software delivery pipeline frees technical staff to spend more time on value-add activities rather than tediously performing repetitive tasks by hand, such as. Reviewing code by eyeballing it to ensure compliance with coding standards. Handling merges of code changes made by more than one person.

Software Review 60

Software Review Software Technical Review Development Team Review 60