Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. De Meyer, C.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. There may be exclusions, such as those steps included in product demonstrations. You may watch the live recording of this webinar at your convenience.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40

Leading Agile

OCTOBER 10, 2018

Business agility means having the capability to “turn on a dime” at low cost and with low risk, to drive innovation, respond to market changes, and overcome the competition. Most systems implemented in large IT organizations are point solutions implemented to solve local (departmental, business unit, or team) problems.

Technical Review 95

Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Engineering 95

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Bitte beachten Sie, dass ich Grammarly verwendet habe, um Tippfehler und Zeichensetzung zu korrigieren: While the cross-team big room planning is very useful, in my experience, SAFe is top-down. Executives that are not close to the customer problems make the decisions at the portfolio level, and teams execute, which can lead to disengaged teams.

Lean 191

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 191

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Therefore, back in 2017, I ran a first survey on the Net Promoter Score® of the Scaled Agile Framework SAFe®. The result back then was -52. Four and a half years later, I reran the poll: SAFe® has been through several iterations, and many more agile practitioners have experienced working with it. Shall I notify you about articles like this one?

Lean 159

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 159

Leading Agile

DECEMBER 13, 2023

The idea again, was that if we could do those things, we could build the right products, we could get faster feedback cycles, we could get better attention to quality, we could get early delivery, we could get predictability, we could get efficiency, we could get lower costs, we could get innovation. Or does it start with the people?

Governance 69

Governance Government SCRUM Agile 69

Leading Agile

DECEMBER 13, 2023

The idea again, was that if we could do those things, we could build the right products, we could get faster feedback cycles, we could get better attention to quality, we could get early delivery, we could get predictability, we could get efficiency, we could get lower costs, we could get innovation. Or does it start with the people?

Governance 62

Governance Government SCRUM Agile 62