Scrum.org

MAY 4, 2020

We had a look at common remote agile anti-patterns; we analyzed remote Retrospectives, Sprint Plannings as well as remote Sprint Reviews based on Liberating Structures. This eighth article now looks into supporting a distributed Development Team organizing a remote Daily Scrum. Do you want to get this article in your inbox?

SCRUM 169

SCRUM Agile Technical Review Development Team Review 169

Scrum.org

AUGUST 17, 2020

As somebody hiring for a Scrum Team, you need to determine for yourself what works for your organization — which is a process, not a destination. Being a Scrum Master does not entail, and should never entail, enforcing processes. Generally, insisting that the team achieve specific KPI (e.g.

SCRUM 231

SCRUM Technical Review Software Review Agile 231

Agilemania

NOVEMBER 11, 2022

Keep reading to find out more about this essential role in your company’s software development team. A Scrum Master is a facilitator who helps a Scrum team to self-organize, collaborate, and continuously improve. Facilitating daily stand-up meetings with the team. Providing feedback to the team.

SCRUM 88

SCRUM Certification Technical Review Lean 88

International Institute for Learning

JUNE 22, 2022

Transforming organizations to become Lean and Agile while maintaining high levels of performance within its teams requires a strong focus on people. After all, these high-performing teams are the ones that deliver change and growth. Now, there are at times two additional steps to the process. By Marianne Rimbark.

Telecoms 52

Telecoms 2022 Lean Development Team Review 52

Leading Answers

MARCH 7, 2019

Designing something is typically a consensus-gathering and problem-solving exercise. Consider the process of designing a new car or home. The process is likely to be iterative and adaptive. Approaches like lean, kanban and agile work well in these uncertain, high-change environments.

Software Review 101

Software Review Technical Review Risk Management Software Developers 101

Planio

AUGUST 1, 2022

For most development teams and startups, ‘becoming Agile’ starts and ends with how you build software. But a full Agile transformation isn’t just about the development process you use — it’s a way to bring creativity, innovation, and lean operations to every aspect of your business. Bring in ongoing training.

Agile 78

Agile Technical Review Leadership Infrastructure 78

Planio

MAY 18, 2021

While many teams start by building an MVP (minimum viable product) to get feedback, there’s another option. Agile planning is a process for reconciling your long-term product vision with the inevitable near-term iterations that will influence its development. Review and update your Agile roadmap every few months.

Agile 78

Agile Planning Influencer Initiating 78

Leading Answers

JUNE 14, 2018

Can the average organization actually become a disruptive leader just by adopting the structures, tools and processes from the real disruptive leaders? They aim to instil lean concepts of respect for people, minimization of waste, and value delivery. Handoffs are very wasteful—they contribute to the eight lean DOWNTIME wastes….

Technical Review 116

Technical Review Agile Lean Sustainability 116

Wrike

MARCH 23, 2021

RTE Process outline. A critical part of every program increment planning is to define the complete PI planning exercise, how it works and clearly stating the goals and end-objectives of doing the entire event in the first place. No PI planning means that your team is not doing SAFe. Group breakouts.

Agile 36

Agile Planning Development Team Review Software Review 36

Leading Answers

JUNE 14, 2018

Can the average organization actually become a disruptive leader just by adopting the structures, tools and processes from the real disruptive leaders? They aim to instil lean concepts of respect for people, minimization of waste, and value delivery. Handoffs are very wasteful—they contribute to the eight lean DOWNTIME wastes….

Technical Review 60

Technical Review Agile Lean Sustainability 60

Scrum.org

AUGUST 6, 2019

As a Scrum Master, you develop and help others develop strategies to become more successful with Scrum. How is the Development Team going to collaborate to achieve the Sprint Goal? How does management interact with Scrum Teams? You decide to use Mad Tea , a Liberating Structures in Development.

SCRUM 65

SCRUM Development Team Review Closing Lean 65

MPUG

JANUARY 9, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. So we move kind of, basically through the process of looking at one of the tools that are available. And I promise, I won’t make this a typing exercise.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review Engineering Software Review Development Team Review 52

Leading Agile

OCTOBER 10, 2018

I was showing their development teams how to automate functional tests using Cucumber. During a workshop for one of the teams, I learned they did not write or maintain application code. As they were working through the hands-on exercises, their lead Business Analyst asked, “Can Cucumber read Excel files?”

Technical Review 95

Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Engineering 95

Leading Agile

MARCH 17, 2021

And then the process developed a point of view around kind of why companies were jacking it up. They do daily stand-ups, they do reviews and retrospectives. And lean manufacturing frontline workers can always safely pull the cord if they start to see problems, everything stops, the issue gets solved. You can’t.

2021 62

2021 Agile Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM 62

Leading Agile

AUGUST 20, 2018

Reviewing code by eyeballing it to ensure compliance with coding standards. Preparing test data to exercise applications prior to deployment. The company wanted to automate their dispatching process. They asked a software developer what it would take, and he estimated something like 20,000 pounds over several months.

Software Review 78

Software Review Software Technical Review Development Team Review 78