Project Bliss

MAY 10, 2017

It came about during a ski trip in 2001. This group of guys recognized a need for a more adaptive alternative to the regimented, documentation-driven software development process. Working software over comprehensive documentation. Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility.

Software Developers 191

Software Developers Software Development Software Review Agile 191

nTask

FEBRUARY 20, 2019

Ever since the term Getting Things Done (GTD) was coined by David Ellen in 2001, there has been a wave of tools identifying themselves as one of the best to-do list apps for getting things done. Due dates and priority level. The tool allows you to quickly create your daily to-dos and assign due dates to stay on track.

2019 83

2019 Technical Review 2001 Software Review 83

International Institute for Learning

DECEMBER 21, 2021

Since the Agile Manifesto was written in 2001 by a group of software practitioners, Agile approaches have been taking over the project management scene at a steady pace. Adding to the confusion, there is no shortage of technical papers elaborating on the various methodologies. By Karim Radwin , CAIA, PMP. Closing : Hurray!

Agile 85

Agile Technical Review Construction 2001 85

Binfire

AUGUST 27, 2017

Until recently some academics and Project Management Institute (PMI) considered Agile method, not a serious contender in project management due to the fact that is very hard to set a due date for project’s completion in the Agile method. Working software even with limited functionality at the expense of excessive documentation.

Agile 97

Agile Technical Review Software Review Development Team Review 97

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 28, 2020

New Technology. Maturity of product technology. I am going to review two of the most popular methodologies (see Figure 1) that you may choose to be best for the type of business you are in. The Agile model is lightweight, uses an informal communication style, is less document oriented, and uses less defined rules and policies.

Retail 119

Retail PMI 2001 2011 119

Binfire

APRIL 7, 2017

Until recently some academics and Project Management Institute (PMI) considered Agile method not a serious contender in project management due to the fact that is very hard to set a due date for project’s competition in Agile method. Working software even with limited functionality at the expense of excessive documentation.

Agile 100

Agile Technical Review Software Review Development Team Review 100

Planio

MAY 24, 2019

First published in 2001 with a revised version in 2015, the book and accompanying system both focus on one central theme: organizing all the “stuff” battling for your attention so you can make smart decisions, properly prioritize , and do focused work without stressing out. Set up regular reviews so the system doesn’t fall apart.

2019 109

2019 2001 Technical Review Software Review 109

Wrike

OCTOBER 12, 2022

Projects are broken down into quick sprints – two to four-week cycles that allow sufficient time for teams to make tangible progress and review the work done before advancing with the rest of the project. Sprint review: The sprint review is one of two post-sprint meetings. What are the four values of Agile?

Agile 36

Agile Development Team Review Software Review Technical Review 36

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 24, 2018

Root Cause Analysis is a systematic documented approach to arrive at the true Root Cause of the process problem. A Taxonomy of an IT Project Failure: Root Causes,” Walid Al-Ahmad, Et Al, International Management Review, Vol. Why Do Information Technology Projects Fail?” 1/2, 2001, pp. Perry, and Dieter Stoll, ICSE 2000.

2014 45

2014 Aerospace 2011 2013 45

Appfluence

MARCH 8, 2021

Over the last few decades, we’ve witnessed how the world has changed and adapted to new technologies. It all came together in 2001: a bunch of software developers got together to discuss the core philosophy and principles behind agile project management. Working software over comprehensive documentation. Collaboration.

Agile 36

Agile Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 36

Wrike

SEPTEMBER 22, 2021

These Agile values and principles were first developed and set out in a charter known as the Agile manifesto, which was written in 2001 at a gathering of developers and programming professionals. Working software over comprehensive documentation. Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility.

Agile 36

Agile 2001 Software Review Technical Review 36

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 10, 2021

Working software over comprehensive documentation. We are trying to break silos, just look how people communicate now compared to 2001, those of us who remember. People and the world move faster than tools and technology companies ever can. We could not wait for technology to be fully in place to handle it.

Agile 247

Agile 2001 Technical Review Software Review 247

Online PM Courses

SEPTEMBER 16, 2018

Scrum Alliance was the first (2001) major organization to promote scrum, and to offer its certifications. It has the most complex set of options of any organization I have reviewed. They have their own Scrum methodology document and an Agile certification programme based around this. Scrum Alliance. ScrumStudy.

Certification 113

Certification Agile Prince2 PMI 113

The IIL Blog

SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

In 2001, a group of software development thought leaders came together and devised the Agile Manifesto. The Benefits of Agile Project Management Agile project management often results in the early release of benefits due to its incremental nature. Working software over comprehensive documentation.

Agile 88

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Development Team Review 88

Scrum.org

JANUARY 27, 2021

Reviewer(s): Russell Miller PST. However the technology of the time was unable to automate at that scale, so the only available “machines” were people. This was the birth of the Agile movement with the Scrum Framework (1993), the Agile Manifesto (2001), and later Kanban (2004). Agile Manifesto, 2001.

2001 213

2001 Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 213

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 3, 2020

The article discusses possible scientific explanations for the success of a personal productivity approach called “ Getting Things Done ” (GTD; Allen, 2001). Developing a new product requires understanding of the users, of the technologies involved and what makes something valuable (or not). Gehring (eds.), 155–170; Rogers, R.

2002 202

2002 SCRUM 2007 2003 202

Planio

JULY 22, 2020

Swipe to Unlock: The Primer on Technology and Business Strategy. Technical documentation. These books range from technical guides to quick catch-ups on the core principles of project management, from how to gather requirements and plan your timeline to communicating and inspiring your team. Go-to-market strategy.

2020 148

2020 Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Software Review 148

Resource Guru

OCTOBER 18, 2022

The Agile method was created in 2001 by a group of 17 software developers who published a set of agreed-upon values and principles ( the Agile Manifesto ) that drove success in their development process. You can have the fanciest tech in the world, but it doesn’t matter if you don’t have the right people in place working together.

Agile 98

Agile Technical Review Project Life Cycle Software Review 98

Online PM Courses

NOVEMBER 11, 2018

And one of those services is Information Technology: IT. Keeps services under review to ensure they will continue to meet future needs. IT service management is performed by IT service providers through an appropriate mix of people, process and information technology.” ITIL Version 2 appeared in 2001. Who Owns ITIL?

Technical Review 71

Technical Review 2011 2007 Prince2 71

Wrike

MAY 11, 2023

This is typically done with two different (but frequently confused) meetings: Sprint review: Discuss progress on the product itself Sprint retrospective: Discuss the team’s work together and how their communication, systems, and processes can improve Remember how Agile focuses on delivering value sooner?

Software Developers 36

Software Developers Software Development Software Review Agile 36

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management Briefings and Presentations. Technical Performance Measures (#TPM). Cost, Schedule, and Technical Performance Management (#CSTPM). Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management. Table of Contents (Click the Name to go to Section).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

Online PM Courses

JANUARY 8, 2018

Go / No-go Review (literal name). So, at each stage gate, the project’s decision-makers review your project against a set of criteria. Repeat work (stay in the stage), for resubmission for Stage Gate Review. Rigorous Stage Gate Review. A Stage Gate Review is a process for achieving a robust Go/No-go decision.

Process 67

Process Prince2 Governance Government 67

Design2Train

FEBRUARY 25, 2019

The Design Phase is both the instructional and technical foundation of the finished product. Identify Existing Information, Data and Information Gaps: Whether you are “recycling” an existing classroom training program or starting a new program, it is critical to gather all of the relevant documentation to sift and sort upfront.

2001 40

2001 Technical Review Consulting Manufacturing 40

Workzone

AUGUST 4, 2021

As of April 1, 2021, Workzone is ranked as the #1 Asana Alternative in all ranking categories: Overall, Functionality, Ease of Use, Value for Money, and Customer Support by user reviews at Capterra , Software Advice , and GetApp by user reviews. 1 Asana Alternative Review: Workzone. Ready to see the #1 rated Asana alternative?

2021 26

2021 Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 26

Workzone

JULY 23, 2021

Upload documents, create a new action item, check notifications, and more without opening a new tab on your browser. Reviews from the #1 Rated Hive Alternative: Workzone. Here’s a look at Hive’s primary competitors and where they rank according to leading software review site Software Advice. Request Demo.

2021 26

2021 Software Review 2002 Technical Review 26

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

Bool, CrossLink: The Aerospace Corporation, Winter, 2000/2001, pp. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 3(2), 72-84. Towards a simplified definition of Function Points,” Luigi Lavazza, Sandro Morasca, and Gabriela Robiolo, Information and Software Technology 55, pp. 61, September 2004.

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

Review on Traditional and Agile Cost Estimation Success Factor in Software Development Project,” Zulkefli Mansor, Saadiah Yahya, Noor Habibah Hj Arshad, International Journal on New Computer Architectures and Their Applications (IJNCAA) 1(3): 942–952. “The Information Technology and Computer Science , 2012, 8, 43–50. 1, January 2007.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2006 2005 2013 64