International Institute for Learning

JULY 7, 2022

During the last two decades there has been the emergence of a number of software development methods as a response to the inefficiency of existing software development methods in rapidly changing environments (Highsmith, 2004). Creativity in agile systems development: a literature review. By Luigi Morsa. Fowler (2001).

Innovation 59

Innovation Agile 2002 2001 59

International Institute for Learning

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

The diligence, the dedication, and the attention in performing a task paid by each single employee, or even by the teams, separately, could not be enough. Siddiqi, “Beyond Earth: A Chronicle of Deep Space Exploration, 1958-2016”, Office of Communications – NASA History Division, Sept. COM EDITOR, “Checks and Balances”, Dec.

2022 52

2022 Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 2017 52

Gunther Verheyen

OCTOBER 25, 2020

October 2020. Due to delayed negotiations, the project is already late and the real work hasn’t even started. Two software architects give me a 15-minutes introduction of eXtreme Programming. October 1995. Scrum turns 25. Hip hip hooray! September 2003. I fall for it. Completely. Some things take time.

SCRUM 105

SCRUM 2004 2003 2011 105

Project Pulse Journal

MARCH 13, 2024

Imagine being equipped with tools and techniques to overcome the hurdles of virtual team management, from establishing clear communication strategies to track productivity to optimizing meeting efficiency and leveraging project management software features.

PMO 52

PMO Technical Review Governance Government 52

PM Times

APRIL 7, 2021

2016) synthesized views from 42 relevant papers on the subject matter and was able to classify them into 17 categories. 2016)” as explained by Chapman. For example, how many lines of code, number of tasks, number of issues, number of task dependencies, the exact number of requirements, and whether or not they are understandable.

2016 52

2016 2014 PMO Software Review 52

nTask

OCTOBER 29, 2020

According to surveys conducted, as of 2016, 66% of enterprises run a business process improvement program occasionally or never. Therefore, you can understand the Business Process Improvement as the exercise of identifying, analyzing, improving, and then reviewing existing business processes. Step 5: Refine and Review.

Process 133

Process Technical Review Lean Software Review 133

Henny Portman

OCTOBER 2, 2020

So, I followed this training and certification in March 2020 (just before the lockdown due to COVID-19) in Vilnius, Lithuania and I was looking forward to the first assignment, hopefully in Asia. The IPMA Project Excellence Model (IPMA PEM) was introduced in 2016 as an updated version of the model that has been in place since 2002.

Software Review 86

Software Review PMO Technical Review 2002 86

International Institute for Learning

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

The risk with larger teams is that they can be more vulnerable to poor communication, fragmentation, and free riding due to a lack of accountability [3]. Martine Haas and Mark Mortensen, “The Secrets of Great Teamwork”, Harvard Business Review, June 2016. This alone is a good reason to pay attention to the two-pizza rule [5].

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team 2022 Technical Review 2002 52

Wrike

FEBRUARY 23, 2016

We also discussed ways to combat chronic low productivity, the evolution of PM technology, and what he predicts project management will look like in 2020. PMOs must get clear direction from the CIO or this will continue to be a major challenge in 2016. Review the day : do you owe anyone anything before you leave?

PMO 51

PMO Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Consulting 51

MPUG

MAY 24, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. The MPUG activity code for claiming the session is on the screen now. So this is the first one that we are going to be reviewing today. Raphael Santos: All right.

Software Review 40

Software Review Artificial Inteligence Software Developers Software Development 40

MPUG

NOVEMBER 4, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. MPUG activity code for claiming the session in on the screen now. Jigs Gaton: So, what software tools? My name is Kyle and I’ll be the moderator today.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review Risk Management 52

MPUG

JULY 1, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. PMI PDUs in the technical category and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session was on the screen now. My name is Kyle and I’ll be the moderator today.

Risk Management 52

Risk Management Risk 2016 Underperforming Technical Team 52