Velociteach

MARCH 6, 2023

Hear about a stalled project that was threatening the accreditation of a popular city zoo. Our guest, Megan Young, inherited this project with no knowledge of the requirements, and with no plan or clear scope. Hear her advice on prioritizing, budget planning, addressing scope creep, negotiating tips, and team motivation.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Budget Software Review 2020 52

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

requires making estimates) ? Risk Management is essential for development and production programs. Information about key project cost, (technical) performance, and schedule attributes is often uncertain or unknown until late in the program. Making these decisions in the presence Uncertainty ? reducible and irreducible ? De Meyer, C.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Wrike

SEPTEMBER 3, 2023

In today’s rapidly evolving world, industries across the globe are embracing digital transformation to stay ahead of the competition and deliver innovative solutions to their clients. These drivers have forced companies to re-evaluate their processes and embrace new technologies to stay competitive and meet evolving client expectations.

Innovation 36

Innovation Construction Energy Technical Review 36

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

requires making estimates) ? This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. These papers and other resources were retrieved from public sites. Risk Management is essential for development and production programs. De Meyer, C.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

LiquidPlanner

JULY 25, 2017

Project teams transitioning to Agile can often struggle with project roles and the overall team structure. The traditional software development team is comprised of the following roles: Role. Responsibility. Leads the technical solution delivery and directs software development team. Application architect.

Agile 84

Agile Infrastructure Software Developers Software Development 84

Agilemania

DECEMBER 29, 2022

The ART is a collection of many Agile teams that work together to create and deliver certain solutions. The train typically has 50 to 125 people working together to create and implement particular solutions. A period of time set out for solution planning, development, testing, and feedback. What is PI Planning?

Planning 52

Planning Lean Development Team Review Software Review 52

Herding Cats

APRIL 30, 2019

A recent lawsuit by Hertz Rental Car against Accenture has turned into a rallying cry by Agilest and No Estimates advocates. Good acquisition starts with understanding the business process for acquiring a solution. We play this role in ERP acquisitions for commercial and government clients . Court Document. Assessment.

Software Review 41

Software Review Technical Review Engineering 2018 41

Workzone

JANUARY 29, 2019

It involves a shared vision, mutual respect, and in-depth understanding of each other’s role in a project with the goal of achieving excellent business outcomes and outstanding customer experience. Consider this scenario: A large insurance company developed a new suite of products to meet unique customer needs.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Manufacturing 52

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Table of Contents (Click the Name to go to Section). Management Processes (#MP). Planning and Scheduling (#PS).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

Leading Agile

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

When I first learned about Agile methods in 2002, the principles seemed to offer an ideal solution to many organizational issues common at the time. High WIP levels and failure to recognize delivery capacity, identify scarce resources, and consider estimates led to intense pressure to deliver late in the project schedule. Stable Team.

Agile 115

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review 115

MPUG

MARCH 3, 2022

Most relevant to our session today is Michael’s role as Chief Architect at Envorso and his previous role at Disney, which included management of tools such as Jira and Confluence. There may be exclusions, such as those steps included in product demonstrations. Melanie: Next up, J Caldwell. Oh, there we go.

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review Software Software Developers 52

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. There may be exclusions, such as those steps included in product demonstrations. You may watch the live recording of this webinar at your convenience.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Bitte beachten Sie, dass ich Grammarly verwendet habe, um Tippfehler und Zeichensetzung zu korrigieren: While the cross-team big room planning is very useful, in my experience, SAFe is top-down. Executives that are not close to the customer problems make the decisions at the portfolio level, and teams execute, which can lead to disengaged teams.

Lean 181

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 181

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Therefore, back in 2017, I ran a first survey on the Net Promoter Score® of the Scaled Agile Framework SAFe®. The result back then was -52. Four and a half years later, I reran the poll: SAFe® has been through several iterations, and many more agile practitioners have experienced working with it. Shall I notify you about articles like this one?

Lean 149

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 149

MPUG

OCTOBER 24, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. There may be exclusions, such as those steps included in product demonstrations. You may watch the live recording of this webinar at your convenience. Tim Runcie: Excellent, Kyle.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 40