Celoxis

JANUARY 5, 2018

1) Review the Year: For as long as I can remember, I have kept an annual professional journal, using a variation of bullet journal technique. I also use it as a year in review tool. I use weekly reviews and look-ahead rituals as well as the 18-Minutes A Day Reflection Technique. Year in Review.

2018 0

2018 Technical Review Software Review 2017 0

LiquidPlanner

NOVEMBER 2, 2017

Drawing from his years leading technology projects at Microsoft, Berkun offers readers field-tested philosophies and strategies for defining, leading, and managing projects. If you’re leading technology projects, this is a must-read. While Abeid hasn’t released a new podcast since 2016, the archives are still worth exploring.

Technical Review 113

Technical Review 2018 Certification Underperforming Technical Team 113

Wrike

AUGUST 7, 2019

In their article, they reference the Project Management Institute’s (PMI) 2016 Pulse of the Profession report, which states that out of every $1 billion invested in projects, $122 million is wasted due to poor execution. billion in 2016, the industry saw its slowest growth since 2013. agency revenue rose 4.4%

Technical Review 61

Technical Review 2016 2027 2017 61

Planio

APRIL 18, 2018

Just as an example, in 2016, UK communications company TalkTalk were fined £400,000 for failing to protect customer data from being accessed by hackers. Review your processes for collecting data and select the most appropriate lawful basis (or bases) for each activity. So thinking about why you’re collecting data early on is a must.

Technical Review 89

Technical Review Controlling Process Monitoring 89

Scrum.org

AUGUST 19, 2021

And what about the socio-technical skills of Developers? In this post, I summarize the findings from an academic peer-reviewed publication by Daniel Russo (2021), a professor at the University of Aalborg. management support, technical skills) while everything else is kept equal. Good research always builds on earlier research.

Agile 229

Agile Technical Review 2021 Influencer 229

Project Bliss

JANUARY 30, 2022

This article was originally published on September 30, 2016, and has been updated. The project manager answers questions and translates requirements and technical details into terms that non-technical users can understand. Many organizations don’t fully understand the benefits of project management. Change Management.

Software Review 296

Software Review Technical Review Risk Management Budget 296

MPUG

NOVEMBER 4, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Within you history, you can print or download your transcript and certificates of completion, including the one for today. Nonprofits, as normal.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review Risk Management 52

Rebel’s Guide to PM

OCTOBER 10, 2016

He’s taken the PERT (Project Evaluation and Review Technique) estimating approach to the next level by letting you add a dash of professional judgement in with the numbers. Visit William’s website and download a free SPERT template. Don’t forget to visit the Statistical PERT website and download your free estimating resources.

Estimate 150

Estimate Software Review Technical Review 2016 150

MPUG

JULY 1, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. PMI PDUs in the technical category and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session was on the screen now. My name is Kyle and I’ll be the moderator today.

Risk Management 52

Risk Management Risk 2016 Underperforming Technical Team 52

MPUG

JULY 17, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. This session is eligible for one PMI PEU in the technical category. We can’t link to a value list of Microsoft Project, it’s a technical limitation.

Software Review 52

Software Review 2014 Planning Technical Review 52

MPUG

MAY 6, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI, PDU in the technical category, and the code for claiming that with PMI is on the screen now. Technology is wonderful.

Performance Measurement 52

Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Governance 52

Paymo App

FEBRUARY 8, 2018

Here are the seven key factors that we took into account when reviewing the time tracking software in this guide: Core Features: The most important things that should influence your decision are the tool’s main features. Capterra and G2 Crowd are two reliable user review platforms that aim to provide objective user feedback.

2018 75

2018 Software Review Software Technical Review 75

MPUG

MAY 21, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And today’s session is eligible for one PDU in a technical category, the activity code for claiming that with PMI is on the screen now. Thank you, Kyle.

Performance Measurement 52

Performance Measurement Technical Review Software Review Budget 52

MPUG

APRIL 2, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. You will notice I chatted out the link to Mike’s downloads for this session. He’s a subject matter expert in a range of technologies.

2016 52

2016 Closing Software Review Technical Review 52

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

Review on Traditional and Agile Cost Estimation Success Factor in Software Development Project,” Zulkefli Mansor, Saadiah Yahya, Noor Habibah Hj Arshad, International Journal on New Computer Architectures and Their Applications (IJNCAA) 1(3): 942–952. Springer International Publishing, 2016. 449-462, July 2004. 1, January 2007.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2006 2005 2013 64

MPUG

AUGUST 4, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. I did work full-time for the Liquor Control Board of Ontario until I retired in 2016, and then started up my own consulting company, basically Office 365 and SharePoint Online.

Technical Review 40

Technical Review Artificial Inteligence Governance Government 40

MPUG

JULY 9, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. The session is eligible for one PMI, PDU in the technical category. And today’s session is eligible for one PDU in the technical category.

Initiating 52

Initiating Software Review Application Development Risk Management 52

MPUG

MAY 24, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is 45 minutes long and eligible for three quarters of a PMI PDU in the technical category. We can just go ahead and download them.

Software Review 40

Software Review Artificial Inteligence Software Developers Software Development 40

LiquidPlanner

JULY 13, 2016

I’ve reviewed some of these apps and DIY app development tools in the past for clients. While these tools may never replace some enterprise applications, they are good enough in 2016. These technological changes will make for a more decentralized IT organization. Download our eBook, “ Agile for Everyone.”.

Development Team Review 94

Development Team Review PMO Finance Technical Review 94