Scrum.org

MARCH 18, 2020

On November 22nd, 2019, I gave the closing keynote at Scrum Deutschland, a talk called ‘The Four Things You Do To Prevent Value Delivery.’ And now in these four articles. . A new product had been developed to replace an older, third party solution that was no longer tenable. Background. So what happened?

Technical Review 138

Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Development Team Review 138

Scrum.org

JULY 29, 2019

In my role as an Agile coach and Scrum trainer, I get the chance to talk to a lot of Scrum Masters and teams. When I ask them about what their team is measuring, the most common answers I hear are velocity, story points, and burn-down charts. Tweet from Ron Jeffries, May 23, 2019. And that's important!

Technical Review 146

Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Development Team Review Software Review 146

nTask

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019

In this brief article, we will help you study some effective tools and techniques which can be used in different fields of the organizational culture that facilitate you in creating an efficient strategy and to successfully deliver a top-notch project. Agile Project Management. Program Evaluation and Review Technique.

Critical Chain 112

Critical Chain Underperforming Technical Team Development Team Review Software Review 112

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 18, 2023

In this article, we will debunk 10 common myths about Scrum. Myth #10: Scrum/Agile is More Expensive than Waterfall Reality: Cost-Effectiveness Through Waste Reduction Contrary to popular belief, Scrum teams are not more expensive than teams using Waterfall; in fact, they often prove to be less costly. Scrum can help.

SCRUM 167

SCRUM 2024 Software Review Development Team Review 167

Scrum.org

MARCH 2, 2020

Learn how individual incentives and outdated organizational structures — fostering personal agendas and local optimization efforts — manifest themselves in Scrum stakeholder anti-patterns which easily can impede any agile transition. Do you want to get this article in your inbox? Copyright notice : InfoQ, 2019.

SCRUM 219

SCRUM Development Team Review Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review 219

Scrum.org

SEPTEMBER 14, 2020

If you are looking to fill a position for a Scrum Master (or agile coach) in your organization, you may find the following 47 interview questions useful to identify the right candidate. Do you want to get this article in your inbox? It’s nothing more than a waterfall process dressed-up as a pseudo-agile practice.

SCRUM 195

SCRUM Planning Development Team Review Technical Review 195

Scrum.org

SEPTEMBER 13, 2021

If you are looking to fill a position for a Scrum Master (or agile coach) in your organization, you may find the following 54 interview questions useful to identify the right candidate. Shall I notify you about articles like this one? You can sign up here for the ‘Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter and join 33,000-plus subscribers. ??

SCRUM 205

SCRUM Underperforming Technical Team Development Team Review 2020 205

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 2, 2018

This second post in the ‘Agile ADHD’ series from me, Sally Waters, and my husband Francis, is all about the details of how we implement Scrum at home. To see in detail how we got started and began to adapt this system, you can read my Agile ADHD blog (which lasted for the first six weeks) . Very inspirational. . Steve Trapps.

SCRUM 125

SCRUM 2018 Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 125

Gunther Verheyen

FEBRUARY 27, 2024

In the summer of 2019 I got in touch with O’Reilly Media about their ambition to add a book about Scrum to their “97 Things” series. O’Reilly and I compiled and merged our lists of potential authors and in August 2019 I started contacting them as potential contributors.

SCRUM 71

SCRUM 2004 Software Review 2019 71

nTask

OCTOBER 8, 2019

If you are in such a position that you are responsible for setting the direction and scope of a team to work on a project, then you should be able to write an effective Project Charter and in this article, we’ll guide you on project charter examples. Review with Team Representatives. Use A Template.

Initiating 92

Initiating Budget Risk Management Development Team Review 92

TrustRadius Project Management

FEBRUARY 21, 2019

*This article has been updated on February 21, 2019 based on new research conducted by the TrustRadius team*. Before undertaking any development project, the most important decision to make is how to approach the project as a team. The Agile method is newer than the Waterfall method, but it’s not exactly brand new.

Software Review 132

Software Review Agile Development Team Review Software Developers 132

Scrum.org

OCTOBER 12, 2020

On the one side, they address typical Scrum events such as Sprint Planning, Sprint Review, and the Sprint Retrospective. Do you want to get this article in your inbox? November 19, 2020 : If you use Scrum then join the free Hands-on Agile meetup—it will be worth your time ! No one can force work upon the Development Team.

SCRUM 226

SCRUM Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Software Review 226

Scrum.org

OCTOBER 19, 2020

If you are looking to fill a position for a Scrum Master (or agile coach) in your organization, you may find the following 47 interview questions useful to identify the right candidate. Do you want to get this article in your inbox? Would you recommend formal Daily Scrums for all teams, no matter the size or experience level?

SCRUM 161

SCRUM Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Development Team Review 161

nTask

AUGUST 8, 2019

Royce, often but mistakenly called the “father of Waterfall”, is accredited with the first formal description of the process in an article he wrote in 1970. What Dr. Royce was describing was a flawed model for software development as he argued for a model with multiple iterations or runs. Perform Assess Funds on Hand.

Software Review 97

Software Review 2019 Development Team Review Technical Review 97

MPUG

OCTOBER 16, 2019

Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Tim Runcie’s Agile Series Part 2 webinar being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Engineering 40

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 8, 2020

THIS IS A REPOST ARTICLE DETAILING THE KEYNOTE I CO-PRESENTED AT THE LESS CONFERENCE IN 2019. This article is about how we improved on the Spotify inspired model in one tribe inside a Large Dutch Bank. Our Business Lending product is being developed by more than 20 teams spread across 3 sites. scaling [1].

Underperforming Technical Team 152

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review SCRUM Technical Review 152

Teamweek

JUNE 25, 2020

And, while Asana is a great tool for micro-managing work, more creative teams are looking for Asana alternatives that allow better freedom at work. In this article, you’ll learn about 30 alternatives to Asana that are easy to use and help creative teams collaborate better. Particularly, for small teams. Let’s begin.

Underperforming Technical Team 97

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Planning Development Team Review 97

MPUG

JUNE 28, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Because look, 47% of unsuccessful projects fail to meet original goals due to poor requirements. In fact, in 2019 11.9% Hello, my name is Walter Stinnett.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Defining Project Life Cycle 52

International Institute for Learning

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

This implies good performance, optimistic mood, having a fertile environment for new ideas, effective team cooperation, so in a nutshell: only benefits. . Academic literature and the web are full of interesting articles giving reasonable and shareable advice to inspire the leaders. The design of work teams. Schwaber, K.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team 2022 Technical Review 2002 52