Scrum.org
JUNE 1, 2022
Do your Daily Scrums feel like a pointless ritual where everyone just lists what they’ve done yesterday, and what they do will do today? And does your Sprint Review consist of team members listing their individual accomplishments? In our work with Scrum teams, we’ve been part of teams that had it. Some developed it over time.
Scrum.org
FEBRUARY 25, 2020
When I started using Scrum as a software developer back in 2007 I noticed that this new ways of working really worked, then I decided to learn more about and I became a Scrum Master in 2012 and in 2015 I started to teach Scrum, overcoming my fear of public speaking. You love this!”. Step one - The interview. .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Agilemania
DECEMBER 13, 2021
SAFe contains a combination of principles, processes, and best practices that help large organizations in easy adoption of agile frameworks including Lean, Kanban, and Scrum. SAFe vs. Scrum@Scale. SAFe: SAFe is the most popular framework after Scrum. Scrum@Scale: Scrum@Scale is a new entrant among the scaling agile frameworks.
Rebel’s Guide to PM
DECEMBER 16, 2016
This time last year I reviewed the trends in social and collaborative technology in the project management space: some of my predictions had come to nothing and it was interesting to look backward and hold myself accountable for what I said would happen. It’s helped by the underpinning technology.
Herding Cats
MAY 10, 2019
Information about key project cost, (technical) performance, and schedule attributes is often uncertain or unknown until late in the program. Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification,” Marvin Carr, Suresh Konda, Ira Monarch, Carlo Ulrich, and Clay Walker, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, Software Engineering Institute, June 1993.
Herding Cats
MAY 11, 2019
Information about key project cost, (technical) performance and schedule attributes is often uncertain or unknown until late in the program. Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification,” Marvin Carr, Suresh Konda, Ira Monarch, Carlo Ulrich, and Clay Walker, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, Software Engineering Institute, June 1993.
Project Pulse Journal
MARCH 20, 2024
A systematic review of available data and active input from the team is required here, emphasizing the need to leverage collective expertise and insights to determine development strategies. Regular audits and phase gates help teams review project performance and track progress systematically.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
205 
Let's personalize your content