Leading Answers

NOVEMBER 8, 2020

However, this article is about short cuts, a single question that can provide a good indicator for suitability—a litmus test for agile approach suitability. If the promotor had missed the M&Ms requirement, likely the whole setup needed to be thoroughly reviewed before testing.

Agile 78

Agile 2020 Development Team Review Software Review 78

Scrum.org

JUNE 18, 2021

What team cognition looks like for Scrum teams, and what signs tell you whether it's there or not. What research in this area tells us about how you can design, support, and encourage teams to develop team cognition and become high-performing. Pictures of a session where we created a skill matrix with a team.

2010 179

2010 SCRUM 2006 Software Review 179

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

Which activities can be fulfilled by others in the team, and what is needed for that? One of the reviewers of this article, Maarten Dalmijn , noted that he missed “product discovery” as a core activity in the work by Bass (2018). Data from our Scrum Team Survey may shed a light on this. So what do they communicate about?

2014 203

2014 2008 Technical Review 2019 203

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 4, 2020

Do you want to get this article in your inbox? The Product Owner is responsible for maximizing the value of the product resulting from work of the Development Team.” Source : Scrum Guide 2017. To a certain extent, it is also a negotiation between the Product Owner and the Development Team.

Development Team Review 184

Development Team Review Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM Technical Review 184

Epicflow Blog

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

Each of them has certain peculiarities, so development teams can choose the one that works best for them. . One more distinctive feature of Agile methodology is its focus on collaboration and self-organizing cross-functional teams. It can be difficult to assess the efforts and time required for certain deliverables.

Underperforming Technical Team 98

Underperforming Technical Team Agile Development Team Review Software Developers 98

Scrum.org

MAY 4, 2020

We had a look at common remote agile anti-patterns; we analyzed remote Retrospectives, Sprint Plannings as well as remote Sprint Reviews based on Liberating Structures. This eighth article now looks into supporting a distributed Development Team organizing a remote Daily Scrum. Source : Scrum Guide 2017.

SCRUM 159

SCRUM Agile Technical Review Development Team Review 159

Velociteach

MAY 10, 2023

In this article, I will share some approaches that have shaped my approach. By the 6 th Edition (2017), it expanded to 49 processes organized into 10 knowledge areas and 5 process groups. Iterative and incremental delivery, welcoming change, empowered teams, and regular customer engagement are some of its core practices.

Lean 88

Lean Cadence PMI 2001 88

Scrum.org

MARCH 31, 2020

Despite the rapidness of the change, moving to remote worked surprisingly well for many teams, because they were used to some degree of remote work before. Especially development teams and technology firms in general have many years of experience with allowing their workforce to do their jobs from wherever and whenever they like.

Underperforming Technical Team 145

Underperforming Technical Team 2020 Technical Review 2016 145

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 17, 2018

Development Team Organises Its Own Work. The Development Team is both self-organising and cross-functional and by the end of each Sprint provides an increment that is ‘done’ and releasable. The team defines how to organise work in a Sprint. The Scrum Guide, 2017). No need to conduct a code review.

Software Review 109

Software Review Development Team Review 2017 2019 109

Scrum.org

JANUARY 11, 2021

Shall I notify you about articles like this one? The Sprint Review lost its detailed recipe on how to run the event. Interestingly, the authors also axed other elements of the 2017 edition of the Scrum Guide that I thought less contested, for example, the magnitude of work allocated to Product Backlog refinement and servant-leadership.

SCRUM 123

SCRUM 2020 Development Team Review 2017 123

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 4, 2022

Shall I notify you about articles like this one? It consists of a set of roles, meetings, and artifacts that help teams to work together and deliver value to their customers. The key roles in Scrum include the Scrum Master, the Product Owner, and the development team. By the way, it’s free.

ChatGPT 169

ChatGPT Generative AI SCRUM Agile 169

Binfire

FEBRUARY 22, 2017

So how do you choose the best project management software for your team? In this article I lay down the processes that you need to follow for selecting the right project management software for your business. This is not a product review article, but a guide on how to choose the right software for your needs.

Software Review 119

Software Review Software Aerospace Development Team Review 119

Scrum.org

JANUARY 10, 2021

From January 10th, 2021 the Scrum.org assessments have changed to support the 2020 version of the Scrum Guide. The assessments take advantage of the new wording to ensure consistency with the new version of the Scrum Guide. Development Team vs. Developer. Role replaced by accountabilities. Servant Leadership .

2020 199

2020 SCRUM Development Team Review 2017 199

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Therefore, back in 2017, I ran a first survey on the Net Promoter Score® of the Scaled Agile Framework SAFe®. Shall I notify you about articles like this one? Their “HCD” articles were written by Agile coaches who never worked a day in UX and clearly Googled the topic to write the article. The result back then was -52.

Lean 137

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 137

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Deshalb habe ich bereits 2017 eine erste Umfrage zum Net Promoter Score® des Scaled Agile Framework SAFe ® durchgeführt. Their “HCD” articles were written by Agile coaches who never worked a day in UX and clearly Googled the topic to write the article. Again, I have HOURS of content on this—articles, books, videos, etc.

Lean 164

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 164

International Institute for Learning

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

This implies good performance, optimistic mood, having a fertile environment for new ideas, effective team cooperation, so in a nutshell: only benefits. . Academic literature and the web are full of interesting articles giving reasonable and shareable advice to inspire the leaders. Schwaber, K. Creativity. Innovation.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team 2022 Technical Review 2002 52

Wrike

FEBRUARY 22, 2024

This article outlines what to look for when you’re comparing different project collaboration software. Hyper-efficient review, feedback, and approval features speed up processes. where they’ve been mentioned because a task has moved from “In review” to “Ready to publish” or where new assets they’ve requested are available to use).

Software Review 36

Software Review Development Team Review Software Logistics 36

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 8, 2020

THIS IS A REPOST ARTICLE DETAILING THE KEYNOTE I CO-PRESENTED AT THE LESS CONFERENCE IN 2019. This article is about how we improved on the Spotify inspired model in one tribe inside a Large Dutch Bank. Our Business Lending product is being developed by more than 20 teams spread across 3 sites. This was in late 2017. .

Underperforming Technical Team 149

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review SCRUM Technical Review 149

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 5, 2020

Review the changes between 2017 and 2020 Scrum Guides ( click to see revisions ). Concept of separate Development Team within Scrum Team is REMOVED. Now, one team, the Scrum Team, is accountable for Product Owner(ship), Scrum Master(y) and Development of usable increment(s) every Sprint.

2020 150

2020 SCRUM 2017 Development Team Review 150

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 2, 2018

When we started back in July 2017 it was a standard ‘task radiator’ borrowed straight from the boards at work: The columns on this were: Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, In Progress, Needs Review (I think that was the first to go!), We started in July 2017, so we’re well over a year in now. Done, and Established Systems.

SCRUM 122

SCRUM 2018 Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 122

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 17, 2018

Development Team Organises Its Own Work. The Development Team is both self-organising and cross-functional and by the end of each Sprint provides an increment that is ‘done’ and releasable. The team defines how to organise work in a Sprint. The Scrum Guide, 2017). No need to conduct a code review.

SCRUM 28

SCRUM Software Review Development Team Review 2017 28

MPUG

JUNE 28, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And in this particular year, which was 2017, they found that 47% of unsuccessful projects failed to meet original goals due to poor requirements.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Defining Project Life Cycle 52

BeeWits

MAY 16, 2018

Let me tell you a quick story before we continue with this article. We’ll show you a solution to great client communication later on in this article. Uncontrolled developers. Following up with our communication breakdown problems, we must say that most web design projects will involve a level of development.

Software Review 43

Software Review Software Underperforming Technical Team Software Developers 43