ProProfs Project Management

JANUARY 9, 2020

Clearly defining potential project risk factors. Reduce project risks considerably. The Agile project management methodology emerged in 2001, and it is still fast catching up and proving to be a vital tool in the arsenal of most modern project managers. Risk mitigation. Strategies to manage your resources efficiently.

Prince2 122

Prince2 Lean SCRUM Governance 122

International Institute for Learning

DECEMBER 21, 2021

Since the Agile Manifesto was written in 2001 by a group of software practitioners, Agile approaches have been taking over the project management scene at a steady pace. Sprints are broken down even further into tasks, also known as User Stories, that are prioritized based on value and risk. Tasks with high risk are also prioritized.

Agile 85

Agile Technical Review Construction 2001 85

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The risk is created when we have not accounted for this natural variances in our management plan for the project. Dealing with Aleatory (irreducible) uncertainty and the resulting risk requires we have margin. An aleatory risk is expressed as a relation to a value. One starting point is the value at risk.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Herding Cats

JULY 9, 2018

They have five characteristics (Maier, 1998) that make the system of systems designation (Krygiel, 1999; Carlock & Fenton, 2001). . All development takes place in the presence of uncertainty and the risk this uncertainty produces. Systems Management 2 (2001) 325–345, IOS Press. System of Systems” are not monolithic.

2001 31

2001 Software Estimate Performance Measurement 31

Leading Agile

SEPTEMBER 27, 2023

Today, Mike Cottmeyer sits down with Andrew to discuss how LeadingAgile is talking about OKRs and KPIs, the impact governance and teaming strategies have on your ability to run them effectively, why your project mentality might be getting in the way, and how you can get started using them in your business. Okay, cool. So let’s get back.

Underperforming Technical Team 71

Underperforming Technical Team Sustainability Governance Government 71

Herding Cats

JULY 9, 2018

They have five characteristics (Maier, 1998) that make the system of systems designation (Krygiel, 1999; Carlock & Fenton, 2001). . All development takes place in the presence of uncertainty and the risk this uncertainty produces. Systems Management 2 (2001) 325–345, IOS Press. System of Systems” are not monolithic.

2001 28

2001 Software Estimate Performance Measurement 28

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 24, 2018

“SCRAM: A Method for Assessing Risk of Schedule Compliance,” Adrian Pitman, Angela Tuffley, and Betsy Clark, DMO General Manager Systems, Australian Government, ASWEC 2013. Schedule Compliance Risk Assessment Methodology (SCRAM) Combined Process Reference Model and Process Assessment Model, Released Version 2.0, 1/2, 2001, pp.

2014 45

2014 Aerospace 2011 2013 45

The IIL Blog

JANUARY 24, 2024

As governments and organisations began to utilise IT to run their organisations, the concepts of ‘services’ began to evolve. ITIL was partly in response to the UK government’s desire to standardise how we deliver IT services and became the de-facto approach to what became known as ITSM.

2001 78

2001 2007 2024 Information Technology 78

Herding Cats

DECEMBER 4, 2017

The technical measures are a set of attributes used to provide the supplier (developer) and the acquirer (customer) with insight into the progress of the definition and development of the technical solution, the ongoing assessment of the associated risks and issues, and the likelihood of meeting the critical objectives of the acquirer (customer).

2005 37

2005 Performance Measurement Closing Controlling 37

The IIL Blog

SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

In 1994 the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) was created as project managers using RAD strived for increased governance and discipline when using an iterative style of managing projects. In 2001, a group of software development thought leaders came together and devised the Agile Manifesto.

Agile 88

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Development Team Review 88

Online PM Courses

JANUARY 8, 2018

It is an important part of project governance that looks both backwards and forwards. The risks and benefits associated with moving to the next stage. Let’s set aside the very important governance imperative. But what if governance were unimportant to you… or your organization? What is a Stage Gate Process?

Process 67

Process Prince2 Governance Government 67

Leading Agile

MAY 9, 2023

Companies out there, we’re 20 to 23 years into Agile as a formal thing, right from the signing of the Agile Manifesto in 2001. We can start running the entire enterprise in a way that’s risk mitigated where the risks are front-loaded in the system. This is why I think it’s super important.

Agile 71

Agile Engineering SCRUM 2001 71

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management Briefings and Presentations. Risk Management (#RM). Governance (#Governance). Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management. Project Governance - project management is a well-defined concept found in many guidebooks and Bodies of Knowledge.

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

Workamajig

JULY 14, 2019

Higher risk: The rigidity of this methodology means that if you find an error or need to change something, you have to essentially start the project from the beginning. This substantially increases the risk of project failure. Lower risk: With Agile management, you get regular feedback from stakeholders and make changes accordingly.

Underperforming Technical Team 141

Underperforming Technical Team Prince2 Critical Chain Sustainability 141

PM That Works

APRIL 23, 2018

Man Yeah we're risk ready is what we are. As of 2001 you were writing about it. I was blown away as he was starting to say just before you guys dropped off the call about the way back in 2001 you're writing about the free agent army the global economy and the four waves of product management. Where's Rob. Oh no worries at all.

2018 40

2018 Agile Consulting 2002 40

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

Bool, CrossLink: The Aerospace Corporation, Winter, 2000/2001, pp. Monte Carlo Schedule Risk Analysis,” Intaver Institute, Inc. Software Development Projects in Government Performance, Practices and Predictions,” International Software Benching Marking Standards Group, January 2004. “A 61, September 2004. 153, 2007 “Overspend?

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium, 2001. Estimates, Uncertainty, and Risk,” Barbara Kitchenham and Stephen Linkman, University of Keele, IEEE Software , May / June, 1997, “Software Project Scheduling under Uncertainties,” Intaver Institute Inc. “A 1, January 2001. Johnson, STC 2010. 30–41, 2012.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2006 2005 2013 64