Binfire

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

This company is a dinosaur in blockchain terms because it’s been around since 2013, meaning they know how things work. Jira was designed with software developers in mind, but you can use the app no matter what industry you’re in. Jira works perfectly for agile development, which helps to promote teamwork and regular updates.

2013 78

2013 Software Developers Software Development SCRUM 78

Scrum.org

AUGUST 25, 2022

It is also the reason why the principles of the Agile Manifesto can create such motivating environments. al, 2013), healthcare professionals (Papathanasiou et. 2013), and in the workplace (Manganelli, Thibault-Landry & Forest, 2018). Analysis of fault generation caused by stress during software development.

Sustainability 176

Sustainability 2015 2014 2013 176

Digite

JUNE 13, 2018

We’re honored to republish this blog post ‘Beginner’s Guide to Kanban for Agile Marketing’ by Andrea Fryrear which was originally published in the Agile Sherpas blog! They also increase the number of learning opportunities for your Agile team. Compared to Scrum, Kanban is a young work-management method.

Agile 110

Agile Technical Review Cadence Software Review 110

Digite

JANUARY 2, 2017

Since the arrival of Scaled Agile Framework in the world market, there have been comparisons ad nauseum between the Scrum and SAFe frameworks. Many industry experts have come out and pointed possible flaws in the Scaled Agile Framework. However, the Scaled Agile Framework indeed subscribes to the ethos of the Agile manifesto.

Agile 60

Agile Cadence SCRUM 2013 60

Gunther Verheyen

APRIL 24, 2020

Scrum was instrumental in embracing software development as a form of new product development, and thus as complex work. Software and (new) product development are a subset of complex challenges, but the use of Scrum is not limited to it. The rules of the game are well documented. Gunther Verheyen.

SCRUM 110

SCRUM 2003 2010 2013 110

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Project risk management: lessons learned from software development environment,” Young Hoon Kwak and Jim Stoddard,” Technovation , 24(11), pp.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MARCH 17, 2019

Agile Project Management. Agile Software Development for Government Software Intensive System of Systems (SISoS) , Boulder Agile Meetup, 27 July 2016. Integrating Agile Software Development with Earned Value Management , College of Performance Management, IPM Workshop, 2015.

2003 54

2003 2011 2008 Performance Measurement 54

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. 255, April 2010. 920, November 2004. Kwak and J.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Teamweek

JUNE 17, 2020

This new approach puts the focus on adaptability or agility. Agility refers to “an organization’s ability to alter its direction or adjust to operate successfully,” according to leadership consultant Ryan Gottfredson. The terminology is borrowed from software developers. The Project-Based Career Ladder.

Technical Review 90

Technical Review 2013 Consulting Innovation 90

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

This is the motivation for short work intervals found in agile development. . Using the Agile Methodology to Mitigate the Risks of Highly Adaptive Projects,” Dana Roberson and Mary Anne Herndon, 10 th Annual CMMI Technology Conference And User Group , November 5 – 8, 2012, Denver, CO. The probability of something happening.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Digite

MAY 15, 2018

It also encourages everyone to review/adopt the values (in Scrum language) that can help software development teams succeed in building software. As I wrote in 2013, Scrum and Kanban both share a use of values to encourage users of the methods to behave a certain way. You should go read it now.

Development Team Review 93

Development Team Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM 93

ProjectManager.com

MARCH 4, 2022

The scrum methodology was developed as a response to rigid project management approaches such as the waterfall method, which didn’t adapt to the needs of agile product and software development teams. Scrum is part of agile software development and teams practicing agile. Scrum Values.

SCRUM 333

SCRUM Software Review Development Team Review Underperforming Technical Team 333

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 24, 2018

But before going further, let's establish the definitions we need to understand and apply Root Cause Analysis needed to discover the corrective and preventive actions to increase the probability of project success - especially Software Project Success. Daniels, Complex Adaptive Systems, Procedia Computer Science, 20 (2013), pp.

2014 45

2014 Aerospace 2011 2013 45

Gunther Verheyen

DECEMBER 19, 2018

In 2013 I accidentally created a book, “Scrum – A Pocket Guide” In 2018 I deliberately evolved my Scrum travel companion into a second edition. More and different people look for guidance and insights on their journey of Scrum, increasingly in domains beyond software development.

SCRUM 77

SCRUM 2013 2016 2017 77

Gunther Verheyen

FEBRUARY 26, 2024

I embarked on my Agile journey in 2003 when we wrapped eXtreme Programming in Scrum. From 2013-2016 I maintained the official “Professional Scrum” series of Scrum.org meanwhile training candidate-PSTs and shepherding the global community of Professional Scrum Trainers and coaches.

SCRUM 74

SCRUM Certification 2016 2011 74

Herding Cats

DECEMBER 3, 2017

Seems there is still some confusion (intentional or accidental) about the Cone of Uncertainty and its purpose and its use in software development. Google will find each of these for you, as a start to the extensive body of litertaure for estimating agile projects in the presence of uncertainty. 37-48, 2007.

2007 34

2007 2012 2009 2010 34

Planio

JULY 9, 2020

Comfort knowing you’re always running the latest, most stable version of the software. Agile Project Management out of the box. It was developed to help teams collaborate on the tasks, bugs, features, and steps needed to complete a project, visually track their progress, and plan their next steps using Gantt charts. Reliability.

2006 88

2006 2007 Closing Agile 88

Herding Cats

AUGUST 25, 2017

Can All This Formality Have Any Use in Modern Software Development? The notion that agile development is a free-for-all development of what ever the customer wants to produce next, with the customer identifying the next important thing to develop works just fine for de minimus projects. McComb, Deanna M.

2014 38

2014 2013 2012 Engineering 38

LiquidPlanner

NOVEMBER 2, 2017

He explains how to succeed or fail fast for projects that are too uncertain to use waterfall project management and too complex to succeed with agile project management. Hosted by Peter Taylor, this podcast began in 2013 after he published his best-selling book by the same name. Cost: Coursera: Agile Development Specialization.

Technical Review 113

Technical Review 2018 Underperforming Technical Team Certification 113

Stepping Into Project Management

MARCH 10, 2014

Today we interview Siddhartha Govindraj, who specializes in Lean/Agile processes for software development. An occasional organizer of events as a part of Chennai Agile User Group and speaks in conferences in India and abroad. Agile becoming mainstream now, how do you think the world of project management has changed?

2011 37

2011 Lean 2013 Agile 37

Project Management Hacks

AUGUST 4, 2016

In 2013 , the company delivered 1.5 Through many discussions with my husband – who works in software development – I discovered an interest in the technology field. I led an effort to develop a risk-based software development process. What was the most valuable professional development activity (e.g.

2013 28

2013 2003 Technical Review 2010 28

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2018

IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering, 1 (1984): 4-21. By the way, the pure conjecture that agile enables late changing requirements to not have a significant impact on the cost and schedule of the development project is completely lacking any testable evidence outside of personal anecdotes of agile advocates.

Software Developers 34

Software Developers Software Development Risk Management Risk 34

Herding Cats

JANUARY 22, 2017

2] System Analysis, Design, and Development Concepts, Principles, and Practices, Charles Wasson, John Wiley & Sons. [3] 4] Defense Acquisition Guide , Chapter 4, Systems Engineering , 15 May 2013. [5] Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Agile Estimating and Planning, Prentice-Hall, 2005. [12]

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

Herding Cats

JANUARY 17, 2017

2] System Analysis, Design, and Development Concepts, Principles, and Practices, Charles Wasson, John Wiley & Sons. [3] 4] Defense Acquisition Guide , Chapter 4, Systems Engineering , 15 May 2013. [5] Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Agile Estimating and Planning, Prentice-Hall, 2005. [12]

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

Herding Cats

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

2] System Analysis, Design, and Development Concepts, Principles, and Practices, Charles Wasson, John Wiley & Sons. [3] 4] Defense Acquisition Guide , Chapter 4, Systems Engineering , 15 May 2013. [5] Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Agile Estimating and Planning, Prentice-Hall, 2005. [12]

Technical Review 28

Technical Review Estimate 2005 Software Review 28

Scrum.org

AUGUST 3, 2020

Dependencies are an epidemic in software development. There could be many reasons why - perhaps your organization has adopted an Agile framework, but you're not yet structured to support sustainable teams. You may have a strong reliance on vendors or specialists when you start your Agile journey. Schwaber and J.

Underperforming Technical Team 232

Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Software Review Development Team Review 232

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Tim Runcie’s Agile Series Part 1 webinar being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: Hello everyone and welcome to today’s MPUG training series, part one, Understanding and Incorporating Agile Project Management. It’s not all or nothing.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40

International Institute for Learning

JULY 28, 2022

Scrum has its origins in software development, but about ten years ago, other departments in organizations started looking at becoming more agile and analyzing whether the Scrum approach could also be used in their departments— and in projects. The latest version is more agile compatible. Peter Krischel.

Prince2 83

Prince2 SCRUM 2001 Agile 83

Scrum.org

APRIL 7, 2022

Recently, the concept of “fluid teams”, “dynamic reteaming” or “ad-hoc teaming” has gained traction in the Agile community. Each post discusses scientific research that is relevant to our work with Scrum and Agile teams. This corresponds with research on autonomous teams, as well as principles of Agile software development.

Underperforming Technical Team 161

Underperforming Technical Team 2007 2006 2009 161

Scrum.org

AUGUST 17, 2020

When comparing different approaches to develop software, survival bias can lead someone to conclude that plan-driven approaches work well based on a few success stories they have where they did. All drivers consider their own driving skills above average (Roy & Liersch, 2013). Standish Group, 2015). How to reduce this bias.

2015 216

2015 2014 2004 Influencer 216

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Agile Project Management (#APM). Agile Software Development (#ASD). Integrating Agile and Earned Value Management (#AEVM). Agile and Earned Value Management Bibliography of papers, books, and thesis (#Biblio). Those lessons are directly transferable to the management of software development teams.

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

Strategy Execution | PMO Perspectives

DECEMBER 13, 2018

Moonpig was founded in 1999, before Lean and Agile approaches had become mainstream in the UK. It was not until about 2013 that Moonpig first began to adopt Agile practices. In this post Amanda Colpoys – a Lean, Agile and Growth Coach, shares her experiences as she set out to introduce business agility at Moonpig.

Agile 40

Agile Lean Engineering 2013 40

Herding Cats

SEPTEMBER 27, 2016

The presentation " Quantifying the Impact of Agile Practices ," Larry MacCherone at the RallyOn 2013 Conference, presents some results on estimating impacts. The Software Development Performance Index (SDPI) scale on the left ranges - by eyeball measurement - from 46 to 55. How to Estimate Software Development.

Estimate 28

Estimate Agile 2013 Software Developers 28

Wrike

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

Agile Project Management. Project Management Software & Tools. 19% say Agile techniques. Agile Project Management. 38% of organizations report using agile frequently. [6]. 75% of highly agile organizations met their goals/business intent, 65% finished on time, and 67% finished within budget. Other – 6%.

2015 60

2015 Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 60

Workzone

AUGUST 4, 2021

Jira is the flagship product of Australian software developer Atlassian’s. Jira began as a bug tracking software, but it has grown into a popular project management tool. Jira can create great reports for both roadmapping and agile project management. Most teams need more user-friendly software. user/month.

2021 26

2021 Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 26

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 20, 2017

For software development systems like Kanban, which is production line-centric, Litle's Law tells us. λ = average production rate of complete software components. λ = average production rate of complete software components. There are two fundamental assumptions for Little's Law to work in the software development domain".

Underperforming Technical Team 34

Underperforming Technical Team 2008 Software Developers Software Development 34

Herding Cats

APRIL 4, 2019

Lechler, Ting Gao, and Barbara Edington, Project Management Institute, 2013. Agile Risk Management and DSDM Pocketbook , Alan Moran, IARM. Agile Risk Management and Scrum , Alan Moran, Institute for Agile Risk Management, 2014. Software Engineering Risk Management , Dale Karolak, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996.

Risk Management 43

Risk Management Risk 2003 2011 43