Project Pulse Journal

APRIL 2, 2024

As more and more project managers utilize software to track progress, project data becomes more available, leading to data consumption within organizations. Software usage in project management helps managers adapt to the internal and external environment.

Governance 40

Governance Government Influencer Technical Review 40

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 23, 2021

Why is code quality so often an issue? Why do software teams?—?despite despite their best initial intentions?—?often So I was pleasantly surprised when Carsten Grønbejrg Lützen pointed at a peer-reviewed academic paper by Michele Tufano and his colleagues (2015), called “When and Why Your Code Starts To Smell Bad”.

Software Review 201

Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 2015 201

ProjectManager.com

MARCH 4, 2022

The scrum methodology was developed as a response to rigid project management approaches such as the waterfall method, which didn’t adapt to the needs of agile product and software development teams. Scrum is a simple project management framework that facilitates team collaboration on complex product and software development projects.

SCRUM 332

SCRUM Software Review Development Team Review Underperforming Technical Team 332

The Lazy Project Manager

MAY 5, 2016

Based on my ideas and this feedback I checked out the PMI congresses in EMEA and NA and APAC since 2010 and guess what? This is also the basis for ‘blind’ SME (subject matter expert) review of the submissions. There is no escape from reality now. Yes, lots the same faces turning up year after year.

PMI 150

PMI 2010 2015 2009 150

EasyProjects

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019

If you follow the instructions to a tee, it’s going to taste fantastic – just like the reviews say. Agile is most popular in the software industry, but it has found homes in the information technology, engineering, product development, and marketing industries to name a few. Deliver code that is extensible. Disgusting.

Agile 41

Agile Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 41

The IIL Blog

JANUARY 10, 2019

I first met Rich Sheridan when we toured Menlo Innovations as part of a career transformation program I was leading in 2010, called “Shifting Gears.” It was one of our first offerings to teach our “Why” (namely, to end human suffering in the world as it relates to technology and return joy to software) and our “How” (i.e.,

Innovation 103

Innovation 2001 2010 Energy 103

ProProfs Project Management

MAY 6, 2021

Wysocki in 2010 was all about adapting to the changing environment of a project. Also, the client must be completely involved in the management of the project from initiation to completion, and there should be a good relationship of trust. The client should thoroughly review the quality and provide feedback/suggestions.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review Project Life Cycle Software Review 2010 52

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

When we hear of the difficulties of making decisions in the presence of uncertainty, especially about software features and capabilities, there are straightforward ways to solve this problem. In our agile software development world, AHP is rarely found. I came to AHP through a seminar by Dr. James T. References . [1]

Technical Review 47

Technical Review 2010 2014 Software Developers 47

Workzone

APRIL 30, 2020

In 2010 daPulse, created by Wix.com , joined the vast array of project management tools on the market, and in 2017, daPulse went through a transformation to become Monday.com. Designed to come across as colorful and friendly, Monday aims to help you kick your case of the Monday blues through the use of its software.

2020 38

2020 Software Review Technical Review Software 38

Scrum.org

APRIL 7, 2022

Research has linked team cognition to higher performance and motivation (Mathieu et al, 2000), increased effectiveness (Kearny, Gebert & Voelpel, 2009), and generally explains a substantial amount of the variance (~19%) in the effectiveness of teams (De Church & Mesmer-Magnus, 2010). A quick note on who initiates membership changes.

Underperforming Technical Team 189

Underperforming Technical Team 2007 2006 2009 189

nTask

AUGUST 8, 2019

This helped us to simplify how nTask project management software can be used for solving such issues. Its simplicity and ease of implementation has made it the most popular version of the systems development life cycle (SDLC) for software engineering and IT projects. Waterfall is a popular SDLC project management model.

Software Review 97

Software Review 2019 Development Team Review Technical Review 97

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 16, 2021

From 2010 to 2017, I worked several years in three Berlin-based, fast-growing startups in my capacity as Scrum Master, agile coach, and Product Owner. The typical sales pitch goes like this: “we need CRM software, and why would we build something that we can license anyway?” (Which is legitimate.) Participation is free.).

Agile 142

Agile Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 142

MPUG

JULY 17, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Jim is the president of Critical Tools, the makers of WBS Schedule Pro Software. There may be exclusions, such as those steps included in product demonstrations.

Software Review 52

Software Review 2014 Planning Technical Review 52

Epicflow Blog

MARCH 22, 2023

First of all, let’s review the typical cost-cutting measures that companies implement during a crisis or economic recession. When there’s no control over changes, they extend the scope of a project, which results in rework, overload, missing due dates, and finally budget overrun. Let’s delve into the issue. Murphy’s strike).

Software Review 90

Software Review 2023 2010 Estimate 90

Wrike

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

Project Management Software & Tools. 46% of organizations admit to not fully understanding the value of project management, even though that understanding boosts the success rate of strategic initiatives by 16%. [12]. Agile organizations successfully complete more of their strategic initiatives than less agile organizations. (

2015 60

2015 Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 60

Resource Guru

AUGUST 10, 2023

We’ve curated a selection of tools based on category and customer reviews. per person per month Master: Starts at $10 per person per month “With the Guru software we get better insights into our daily planning. That said, there’s an abundance of tools for agencies to choose from. per person per month Blackbelt: Starts at $6.65

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review 2010 Closing 52

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to estimate software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Cost Modeling Agile Software Development,” Maarit Laanti and Petri Kettunen, International Transactions on Systems and Applications, Volume 1 Number 2, pp. Performance Evaluation of non?Markovian

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

MPUG

JUNE 28, 2020

In other words, I initially felt Project was a subset of Excel. But let’s face facts: Microsoft is in the business of selling software, and they were not going to combine these two! I got to thinking about my history with the MSP the other day, and thought the software’s evolution might be an interesting topic to explore.

2007 111

2007 2013 2002 2003 111

MPUG

JULY 23, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session with PMI is on the screen now.

Risk 52

Risk Software Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

MPUG

JULY 23, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session with PMI is on the screen now.

Risk 52

Risk Software Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Agile Software Development (#ASD). Enterprise IT and Embedded Systems (#EIT).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category and the code for claiming today’s session is on the screen now.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 5, 2018

In software development, those managing the project have some understanding the market forces (from their marketing departments), the technology (from their engineering department), and how to manage in the presence of Aleatory and Epistemic risk (the managers running a successful firm). Software projects are non-ergodic.

Software Review 34

Software Review Technical Review Estimate Software Developers 34

Leading Agile

OCTOBER 3, 2023

When I first started thinking through this idea, I was actually really thinking about the idea of practices because back in 2010, a little bit earlier than that, Jim Kundiff, the Scrum Alliance, and those guys were really popularizing the CSM certification, PMI was doing the PMI ACP or a lot of us were part of that. So think about scrum.

Governance 62

Governance Government SCRUM Agile 62

Runrun.it

OCTOBER 1, 2019

The concept originated from software development companies, who found the traditional method of project and workflow management was stifling in many situations. Needless to say, agile management and the agile squad have met with massive success not only in the software development space, but also in companies in different other industries.

Agile 20

Agile Software Review Leadership Technical Review 20

LiquidPlanner

MAY 29, 2018

Which makes sense—after all, Microsoft Project was the go-to project management software for years. The three-point PERT formula used to be supported as an add-in, but was removed with MS Project 2010. The PC version has many different views and tables to review schedule variance, resource commitments and project costs.

Estimate 37

Estimate Technical Review Software Review 2010 37

MPUG

OCTOBER 16, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the code for claim that is on the screen now, that’s mpugwebnlearn091819.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Engineering 40

MPUG

DECEMBER 15, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for 3/4 of a PMI PDU in the strategic category, and the code to claim that is on the screen now. So this is pretty important as well.

Innovation 40

Innovation PMO Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review 40

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ‒ Steve McConnell. The Future of Systems-and Software Development. Springer International Publishing, 2016.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2006 2005 2013 64

Herding Cats

SEPTEMBER 19, 2018

Flight software is always an issue where we work, so those ranges are wider even more. Getting the software qualified is about the same variability as getting it certified, so the same range is used. Getting the software qualified is about the same variability as getting it certified, so the same range is used.

Technical Review 43

Technical Review 2010 Estimate Software Review 43

PM That Works

APRIL 18, 2020

r squared has tailored best practices to help you in all areas of project management, visit r squared consulting.com are you getting the most out of your project management software? In many cases, it is not the software that is failing but the implementation limitations or processes surrounding the use of that software.

Energy 40

Energy 2004 Closing Software Review 40