Project Pulse Journal

APRIL 17, 2024

In traditional Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) models, the DoD might be a phase completion sign-off, where a phase (like design or testing) is incomplete until all specified deliverables are reviewed, approved, and documented. This helps the project team define what needs to be delivered and prevent potential scope creep.

Software Review 52

Software Review Development Team Review Technical Review 2024 52

ProjectManager.com

NOVEMBER 22, 2021

The term scrum was introduced in a “Harvard Business Review” article from 1986 by Hirotaka Takeuchi and Ikujiro Nonaka. It became a part of agile when Ken Schwaber and Mike Beedle wrote the book “Agile Software Development with Scrum” in 2001.

Technical Review 491

Technical Review Prince2 Manufacturing Lean 491

Scrum.org

JUNE 18, 2021

What team cognition looks like for Scrum teams, and what signs tell you whether it's there or not. What research in this area tells us about how you can design, support, and encourage teams to develop team cognition and become high-performing. Pictures of a session where we created a skill matrix with a team.

2010 183

2010 SCRUM 2006 Software Review 183

Scrum.org

MAY 4, 2020

We had a look at common remote agile anti-patterns; we analyzed remote Retrospectives, Sprint Plannings as well as remote Sprint Reviews based on Liberating Structures. This eighth article now looks into supporting a distributed Development Team organizing a remote Daily Scrum. Source : Scrum Guide 2017.

SCRUM 169

SCRUM Agile Technical Review Development Team Review 169

Leading Answers

NOVEMBER 8, 2020

If the promotor had missed the M&Ms requirement, likely the whole setup needed to be thoroughly reviewed before testing. Suitability Assessments Determining if a project fits a predictive (traditional) approach or a more adaptive (agile) one can take many forms. Of course, things get more complicated the deeper you look.

Agile 78

Agile 2020 Development Team Review Software Review 78

Scrum.org

MARCH 31, 2020

Despite the rapidness of the change, moving to remote worked surprisingly well for many teams, because they were used to some degree of remote work before. Especially development teams and technology firms in general have many years of experience with allowing their workforce to do their jobs from wherever and whenever they like.

Underperforming Technical Team 152

Underperforming Technical Team 2020 Technical Review 2016 152

Velociteach

MAY 10, 2023

By the 6 th Edition (2017), it expanded to 49 processes organized into 10 knowledge areas and 5 process groups. Iterative and incremental delivery, welcoming change, empowered teams, and regular customer engagement are some of its core practices. Customers and development teams should work together daily.

Lean 88

Lean Cadence PMI 2001 88

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

Which activities can be fulfilled by others in the team, and what is needed for that? One of the reviewers of this article, Maarten Dalmijn , noted that he missed “product discovery” as a core activity in the work by Bass (2018). Maarten, who is an experienced Product Owner, added that he spends a lot of time on this with his teams.

2014 213

2014 2008 Technical Review 2019 213

Scrum.org

JANUARY 11, 2021

The Sprint Review lost its detailed recipe on how to run the event. Interestingly, the authors also axed other elements of the 2017 edition of the Scrum Guide that I thought less contested, for example, the magnitude of work allocated to Product Backlog refinement and servant-leadership. What are Scrum Commitments?

SCRUM 127

SCRUM 2020 Development Team Review 2017 127

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 25, 2019

Source : Scrum Guide 2017. No matter the frequency of your retrospectives you should always watch out for the following Sprint Retrospective anti-patterns from the Scrum Team, the Development Team, the Scrum Master, as well as the organization: Sprint Retrospective Anti-Patterns of the Scrum Team.

Underperforming Technical Team 202

Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM Development Team Review Agile 202

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 4, 2022

This means having the necessary information and data available, as well as the ability to analyze it and make informed decisions. This means having strong communication channels and mechanisms in place to allow teams to work together effectively. Here I tried the opportunity to have another answer from ChatGPT.

ChatGPT 180

ChatGPT Generative AI SCRUM Agile 180

Scrum.org

JULY 10, 2018

While working diligently behind feature flags, using elements of Scrum, it wasn’t clear to the stakeholders the value being delivered and how well the teams were progressing towards their end goal. It was recognised that a characteristic of the most innovative organisations was the concept of self organising teams. “A

Technical Review 88

Technical Review Development Team Review Engineering 2017 88

Wrike

FEBRUARY 22, 2024

If your team struggles to overcome information silos and resource hoarding, their work will fall short. The best team collaboration tools provide a system for all stakeholders to access the files they need without fuss. Hyper-efficient review, feedback, and approval features speed up processes.

Software Review 36

Software Review Development Team Review Software Logistics 36

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Deshalb habe ich bereits 2017 eine erste Umfrage zum Net Promoter Score® des Scaled Agile Framework SAFe ® durchgeführt. I would love to give you more information if you are publishing this! They looked towards SAFe as a vehicle to improve their collaboration between teams that were located all over the world.

Lean 175

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 175

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 4, 2019

The Scrum Master helps everyone change these interactions to maximize the value created by the Scrum Team. Source : Scrum Guide 2017. See also the detailed lists of services rendered to the Product Owner, the Development Team, and the organization by the Scrum Master as defined by the Scrum Guide.). The Sprint Planning.

SCRUM 120

SCRUM Underperforming Technical Team Development Team Review Technical Review 120

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Therefore, back in 2017, I ran a first survey on the Net Promoter Score® of the Scaled Agile Framework SAFe®. I would love to give you more information if you are publishing this! They looked towards SAFe as a vehicle to improve their collaboration between teams that were located all over the world. how to run a proper review).

Lean 146

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 146

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

The following material comes from conferences, workshop, materials developed for clients. The overarching theme is focused on defining what Done looks like, assessing progress toward Done in units of measure meaningful to the decision makers. Project Success Assessment - A checklist for assessing the processes for project success.

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 8, 2020

This was in late 2017. . I had various conversations and workshops with the development teams and the leadership. With all this information I created an understanding about how the work works over time, and used that systemic understanding to make the following recommendations. Output driven development.

Underperforming Technical Team 154

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review SCRUM Technical Review 154

Planio

FEBRUARY 19, 2020

However, a 2017 study found that software failures cost the U.S. This guide will cover everything you need to know about defining and documenting your test plan and choosing the right test strategies that will ensure your users, development team, and stakeholders are all happy. What information do you need? economy $1.7

Planning 78

Planning Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review 78

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 2, 2018

When we started back in July 2017 it was a standard ‘task radiator’ borrowed straight from the boards at work: The columns on this were: Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, In Progress, Needs Review (I think that was the first to go!), We started in July 2017, so we’re well over a year in now. Done, and Established Systems.

SCRUM 126

SCRUM 2018 Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 126

MPUG

JUNE 28, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And in this particular year, which was 2017, they found that 47% of unsuccessful projects failed to meet original goals due to poor requirements.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Defining Project Life Cycle 52