Project Pulse Journal

NOVEMBER 18, 2023

This article will help you balance diligent project monitoring and foster a less stressful team environment. How to Execute Vision Validation: Revisit Original Documents: Review the project charter, scope, and other initial project documentation to ensure you follow the original vision and objectives. 5 Whys, Ishikawa Diagram, etc.).

Monitoring 40

Monitoring Controlling Technical Review Software Review 40

Project Pulse Journal

NOVEMBER 21, 2023

Many projects risk failure during the closure phase due to overlooked details, miscommunication, teams disbanding too early, or simply the rush to finish. Risk Management and Quality Assurance : A complete review of risks and issues is necessary to resolve any outstanding items. It's an understandable and common concern.

Closing 52

Closing Technical Review 2015 Risk Management 52

Project Pulse Journal

MARCH 22, 2024

Oversee the integration of new technologies and systems to align with strategic objectives. Deliver user stories iteratively and provide insights during sprint reviews to improve product and process quality. Offer insights into emerging technologies and market opportunities to steer strategies.

Governance 52

Governance Government Technical Review Initiating 52

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

Information about key project cost, (technical) performance, and schedule attributes is often uncertain or unknown until late in the program. Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification,” Marvin Carr, Suresh Konda, Ira Monarch, Carlo Ulrich, and Clay Walker, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, Software Engineering Institute, June 1993.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Agilemania

AUGUST 28, 2022

Then the teaching assignment came for me for SAFe ® transformation, and I started taking classes for SAFe ® , and in mid-2017, again with the guidance of my mentor the next target was SPCT, although it’s a really tough selection process that takes all of us back. And submit your documentation. appeared first on Agilemania.

Certification 76

Certification Consulting Lean 2015 76

Online PM Courses

JULY 2, 2018

And, as we have done with the 2016 and 2017 Pulse of the Profession reports, we will take a selective look at the aspects that catch our attention, and encourage you to read the full report for yourself. You can find our previous reviews at: Good News from the PMI Pulse of the Profession 2017 Report. It’s very subtle.

2018 65

2018 Technical Review PMI 2017 65

Scrum.org

JUNE 29, 2019

As recently as 2017, I had a strongly held belief that if I had 30 minutes captive audience with an executive in my contexts with access to a whiteboard, I would (visually) talk about a selection of the following: Listen to the executive, build trust. And we have so many models, so what should we stop doing? .

Leadership 125

Leadership 2019 2011 2018 125

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

Information about key project cost, (technical) performance and schedule attributes is often uncertain or unknown until late in the program. Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification,” Marvin Carr, Suresh Konda, Ira Monarch, Carlo Ulrich, and Clay Walker, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, Software Engineering Institute, June 1993.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 28, 2020

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) Sixth Edition was published in 2017 by the Project Management Institute (PMI). New Technology. Maturity of product technology. Projects drive change! PMBOK Guide and Projects. This is considered by most project managers as the standard for project management.

Retail 119

Retail PMI 2001 2011 119

Herding Cats

DECEMBER 8, 2017

It can be the needed performance of a measure - Effectiveness, Performance, Key Performance Parameter, or a Technical Performance Measures. The specifics of the Technical Performance Measures applied to inform Physical Percent Complete and the Cone of Uncertainty around the TPM are shown here. Here's a summary of these elements.

Performance Measurement 35

Performance Measurement Technical Review 2017 2008 35

The Squad Report

JULY 18, 2018

Which is why we have gathered 10 Project Management hacks you should have known and can still use in the future: Automate your project management methodologies ​ KPMG’s Project Management Survey 2017 reported 80% of organizations, use more than one project management methodology. Don't forget to keep learning.”

Technical Review 40

Technical Review 2017 Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 40

Scrum.org

APRIL 14, 2020

Source : Scrum Guide 2017. Consider crafting a working agreement for the upcoming meeting or workshop if the team has yet done so. Those surveys can be Sprint-specific, penciled-in between the Sprint Review and the Retrospective. This is a compelling pitch as it addresses the why, the what, and the how of the Retrospective.

Underperforming Technical Team 142

Underperforming Technical Team Agile SCRUM Technical Review 142

Runrun.it

JANUARY 23, 2020

As a mid-sized state run bank, DBS already had its hands full in 2019 due to new fintech startups offering exceedingly competitive solutions to traditional banking. He also broke down silos that had developed in the company so that the tech team could help other departments faster and better. And boy did they succeed!

Technical Review 26

Technical Review 2012 Lean Retail 26

Appfluence

DECEMBER 6, 2017

Gartner Enterprise Architecture and Technology Innovation Summit. Enterprise architecture and technology innovation leaders are at the forefront of these efforts, providing the skills and competencies needed to support innovation and master the complexities of new digital business platforms. Location: National Harbor, MD.

2018 34

2018 Construction Engineering Technical Review 34

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 16, 2021

Join us on March 9, 2021 , for a live virtual workshop to create actionable recommendations on how to deal with the outcome of a forensic Product Backlog analysis. From 2010 to 2017, I worked several years in three Berlin-based, fast-growing startups in my capacity as Scrum Master, agile coach, and Product Owner.

Agile 125

Agile Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 125

Scrum.org

APRIL 11, 2022

Otherwise, the Scrum team should invest in a workshop on writing better Product Backlog items.). Due to a lack of refinement, it is likely to leave a lot of value on the table. What technical debt? The Developers do not demand adequate time to tackle technical debt and bugs and preserve the quality standard of the product.

Technical Review 241

Technical Review SCRUM Lean Agile 241

Agilemania

JULY 1, 2022

DevOps is a career in tech that has a lot of opportunities for skilled professionals. The search trends for the term ‘DevOps’ grow to 34% from 2017 to 2022. . DevOps is a combination of technical practices, tools, & cultural philosophies that help in the automation and assimilation of software development and IT services.

2022 98

2022 Software Review Technical Review Software Developers 98

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management Briefings and Presentations. Technical Performance Measures (#TPM). Cost, Schedule, and Technical Performance Management (#CSTPM). The following material comes from conferences, workshop, materials developed for clients. Management Processes (#MP).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 4, 2020

Source : Scrum Guide 2017. The team answers the ‘how’ question – the technical implementation –, and both the team and the PO collaborate on the ‘what’ question: what scope is necessary to achieve the desired purpose.). Otherwise, the team – and the Product Owner – need a workshop on writing user stories.). Conclusion .

Development Team Review 187

Development Team Review Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM Technical Review 187

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2018

Research clearly shows the root causes of most software projects cost and schedule overruns and technical shortfalls comes from poor risk management. Risk can be the potential consequence of a specific outcome that affects the system’s ability to meet cost, schedule, and/or technical objectives. Epistemic uncertainty ?

Software Developers 34

Software Developers Software Development Risk Management Risk 34

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 8, 2020

This was in late 2017. . I had various conversations and workshops with the development teams and the leadership. For example there were IT chapter leads for specific technologies like Pega or Java. Doing CI with the current setup and technology seemed close to impossible.). A couple of days later he called me.

Underperforming Technical Team 151

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review SCRUM Technical Review 151

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

COSMIC Software Estimation Approach,” Alain Abran, ICEAA Workshop, Portland Oregon, June 6?9, Cubaud, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Petri Nets and Performance Models, 1995. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 3(2), 72-84. Performance Evaluation of non?Markovian 1, May 2012.

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

Scrum.org

MARCH 19, 2023

models: The first experiment compares the Scrum Guide 2017 to the Scrum Guide 2020 The second experiment is designing a Retrospective exercise The third experiment is to help a new Scrum team to design a Definition of Done. Experiment 1: Comparing the Scrum Guide 2017 to the Scrum Guide 2020 Prompt : I want you to act as a Scrum Master.

ChatGPT 144

ChatGPT SCRUM Technical Review 2020 144

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Deshalb habe ich bereits 2017 eine erste Umfrage zum Net Promoter Score® des Scaled Agile Framework SAFe ® durchgeführt. It’s a non-viable, workshop everything model that nearly zero UX practitioners adopted. Everything is done by a workshop and team meeting. They don’t workshop their work to death.

Lean 168

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 168

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Therefore, back in 2017, I ran a first survey on the Net Promoter Score® of the Scaled Agile Framework SAFe®. It’s a non-viable, workshop everything model that nearly zero UX practitioners adopted. Everything is done by a workshop and team meeting. They don’t workshop their work to death. The result back then was -52.

Lean 139

Lean Software Review 2022 Technical Review 139