Scrum.org

JUNE 1, 2022

And does your Sprint Review consist of team members listing their individual accomplishments? Wang et al (2006) studied software teams tasked with ERP implementations and found that cohesive teams performed significantly better than less-cohesive teams. Psychological review , 57 (5), 271. R., & Dion, K. Festinger, L.

SCRUM 224

SCRUM 2007 2003 2006 224

Leading Agile

JULY 16, 2018

To call a software development team a well-oiled machine may be taken as a compliment or an insult. Software development isn’t mechanical work, and machines belong in software factories, and nobody likes the idea of a software factory. The post Is Your Software Development Team a Well-Oiled Machine?

Software Developers 72

Software Developers Software Development Software Review Software 72

Binfire

AUGUST 20, 2017

4- DaPulse – DaPulse is a relatively new entry to project management software market. It is popular with software engineering teams due to its integration with code repository and versioning apps like GitHub. It was founded by Andrew Filev in 2006. It also is very light on proper collaboration features.

Software Review 100

Software Review 2006 2010 2012 100

Scrum.org

JANUARY 26, 2020

A software development effort is always a system! Small changes can produce big results—but the areas of highest leverage are often the least obvious (Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline, 2006). There is no blame (Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline, 2006). The problem is chronic and not a one-off event.

2006 231

2006 Underperforming Technical Team Consulting SCRUM 231

Leading Answers

JANUARY 16, 2021

That could take two weeks and cost $100,000 when factoring in the new software license, the team's burn rate, and the cost of delay to the organization. I wrote about these ideas when I started blogging in 2006 as  Risk Profile Graphs. It seemed like an effective way to maximize the overall value delivered.

Risk 145

Risk Underperforming Technical Team 2006 2012 145

Teamweek

MARCH 5, 2024

[2024]”, “articleBody”: “A detailed analysis comparing Timely and Toggl across multiple performance categories…”, “keywords”: [“timely vs toggl”, “toggl vs timely”, “toggl track vs timely”, “toggl and timely”], “author”: { “@type”: (..)

2024 59

2024 Software Review Technical Review Monitoring 59

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 8, 2019

Even Team Foundation Server (TFS) has grown into the new Azure DevOps (Visual Studio) for developers, proving better alignment for Epics, User Stories, Sprints, Requirements, and connecting source code directly to Agile constructs. There are many who have the misconception that Agile is just for software development.

Agile 89

Agile Technical Review Software Review 2006 89

Teamweek

MARCH 8, 2024

On the other hand, Toggl Track is a time management software that values its automated time tracking toolset as much as its manual options. Lets you export billable time into dedicated billing and invoicing software like Xero and Zoho Books. Review Platform Ratings 4.8/5 5 rating from 389 G2 reviews 4.6/5

2024 59

2024 Software Review Technical Review Monitoring 59

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 25, 2020

A growth mindset is a term coined by Carol Dweck in 2006 in her book mindset Mindset: The new Psychology of success to describe the underlying beliefs people have about learning and intelligence. I will explain the peer review at the end of this article. The peer review. . This kept me inspired until November 2019.

2017 175

2017 2018 2016 SCRUM 175

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 22, 2021

To prevail in today’s game of an accelerated innovation-based competition—software is eating the world—, every organization needs to acquire a holistic understanding of an agile product creation process: A vision leads to a strategy that (probably) results in a portfolio of products (and services). Then we don’t have those questions anymore.”

Software Review 148

Software Review Technical Review Cadence SCRUM 148

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 5, 2018

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ? This variation can be explained by the fact that initial concepts do not describe the final software system accurate enough.

2012 48

2012 2007 2011 2010 48

ProjectManager.com

MARCH 4, 2022

The scrum methodology was developed as a response to rigid project management approaches such as the waterfall method, which didn’t adapt to the needs of agile product and software development teams. Scrum is a simple project management framework that facilitates team collaboration on complex product and software development projects.

SCRUM 337

SCRUM Software Review Development Team Review Underperforming Technical Team 337

nTask

JULY 7, 2021

Released in 2006, Redmine is a project management tool that was the go-to choice for many teams and individuals. That is why we curated this list of the top Redmine alternatives you can choose from to help you consider which software best suits the requirements of your team. What is Redmine? Key Features: Project hierarchy.

2021 78

2021 Software Review 2006 Risk Management 78

Teamweek

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Clockify is a reliable time tracking tool; you can see that from the sheer number of positive reviews it gets on 3rd party review sites. Clockify G2 reviews But while I’m sure they are hard at work trying to deliver the best product possible, Clockify isn’t a perfect fit for every company. Toggl Track Price: FREE.

2023 52

2023 Technical Review Software Review 2006 52

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. México, 1 al 3 de Febrero de 2006. Pich, Working Paper, 21/2006, Cambridge University, Judge Business School. “A De Meyer, C. Loch, and M.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Rebel’s Guide to PM

SEPTEMBER 21, 2016

For more up-to-date software reviews, see my complete list here. In case you’ve only just stumbled across this blog, this year I’m celebrating 10 years of blogging about project management. I thought it was time to look back and see what the stand-out articles were over the years. Here are the top 10 articles year by year.

2007 150

2007 2009 2008 2010 150

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. México, 1 al 3 de Febrero de 2006. De Meyer, C. Loch, and M.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

EasyProjects

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019

If you follow the instructions to a tee, it’s going to taste fantastic – just like the reviews say. Agile is most popular in the software industry, but it has found homes in the information technology, engineering, product development, and marketing industries to name a few. Deliver code that is extensible. Disgusting.

Agile 41

Agile Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 41

Herding Cats

JULY 24, 2017

Shipping on time, to specifications, and within budget might be meaningless if a competitor is shipping software that has a greater value to the market. It's suggested from observations, the Cone of Uncertainty (CoU) is not a valid model of how uncertainty behaves in software development projects. Laird and M. 37–48, 2007. .

2007 42

2007 2012 2006 2008 42

Online PM Courses

DECEMBER 11, 2017

There is so much I’ve highlighted in my 2006 hardback edition, that I don’t know where to start. Jim works in Software Development and talks about a particularly tough year. As an author, I know there is a point beyond which a reviewer can over-stay her or his welcome, when sharing an author’s content.

PMI 61

PMI 2006 Software Review Engineering 61

Scrum.org

JUNE 18, 2021

Most of us perceive and interpret a dark alley as a dangerous place due to the potential for robbery, and so we avoid them behaviorally. Butler et al, 2006, Tolin, 2010) are based on this approach (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, CBT). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. References.

2010 189

2010 SCRUM 2006 Software Review 189

Scrum.org

APRIL 7, 2022

Kozlowski & Ilgen (2006) describe this reciprocity as “process begets structure, which in turn guides process”. Wang et al (2006) studied software teams tasked with ERP implementations and found that cohesive teams performed significantly better than less-cohesive teams. In turn, this facilitates further collaboration.

Underperforming Technical Team 178

Underperforming Technical Team 2007 2006 2009 178

Herding Cats

JANUARY 22, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. Software Engineering Economics”. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Software Sizing, Estimation, and Risk Management, Auer-bach, 2006. [15]Jorgensen,

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

Herding Cats

JANUARY 17, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. Software Engineering Economics”. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Software Sizing, Estimation, and Risk Management, Auer-bach, 2006. [15]Jorgensen,

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

Herding Cats

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. Software Engineering Economics”. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Software Sizing, Estimation, and Risk Management, Auer-bach, 2006. [15]Jorgensen,

Technical Review 28

Technical Review Estimate 2005 Software Review 28

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The naturally occurring work effort in the development of a software feature - even if we've built the feature before - is an irreducible uncertainty. Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. McMahon, Cross Talk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering , July/August 2015, pp.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 6, 2019

I had no prior knowledge of agile back then (in 2006). So to me, the work I'm doing is larger than software development. part of this is a result of my work but a part is also due to my style but it is also due to the nature of my job (coaching organizations). It's not so much about being agile.

Agile 15

Agile 2006 Software Review SCRUM 15

Productivity Land

MAY 19, 2023

Here is how this software works: Download an application or extension and install it; Launch Zight and select screen recording preferences. CleanShot X CleanShot X is a modern and stylish software with rich functionality. Since 2006, it has helped users from 190 countries to capture over 100 million videos. per month.

2023 75

2023 Software Review Software 2006 75

Teamweek

APRIL 22, 2021

It has been around since 2006. Improves business visibility: Risks and opportunities spotted during project execution mean you can review your business goals as things change instead of waiting for the annual review. Frequently review your project and strategy alignment to stay on track. Stay on top of SPM progress.

2006 87

2006 Software Review Infrastructure Executing 87

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2018

Microeconomics is applicable to the development is software systems. If we look at the discipline of software engineering, we see that the microeconomics branch of economics deals more with the types of decisions we need to make as software engineers or managers. Software engineering economics." Macroeconomics is not. .

Software Developers 34

Software Developers Software Development Risk Management Risk 34

Teamweek

MARCH 3, 2023

And that’s why we’ve compiled this list of the best project resource management software to help you find one for your specific needs. The bottom line: if you’re looking for the best project and resource management software for your specific needs, you’ll find it below. Who are they best suited for?

2023 52

2023 Planning Software Review Technical Review 52

Scrum.org

AUGUST 17, 2020

More recent analyses have shown that this bias isn’t as fundamental as previously thought (Malle, 2006). When comparing different approaches to develop software, survival bias can lead someone to conclude that plan-driven approaches work well based on a few success stories they have where they did. How to reduce this bias. Dunning, D.

2015 225

2015 2014 2004 Influencer 225

Knowledgeline

OCTOBER 3, 2006

Knowledgeline Tuesday, October 03, 2006 Lexis Nexis Announces atVantage, while Thomson Acquires LiveNote I was recently invited to an Advisory Council meeting by Lexis to discuss their future plans with InterAction and how to better leverage content within it. Practice Enhancement The Best KM Software Yet? Knowledge Management v.

2006 40

2006 2007 Technical Review Software Review 40

Paymo App

FEBRUARY 8, 2018

If you’re here, it means that you’re looking for time tracking software that you will use yourself or with your team. Reviews: Even though every tool works in distinct ways for each business, you can take a look at what existing users have to say. 5 from 325 reviews on G2 Crowd.

2018 75

2018 Software Review Software Technical Review 75

Planio

JULY 22, 2020

The Culture Code: The Secrets of Highly Successful Groups. If you’re also interested in Agile project management, pair the PMBOK with the PMI’s new Agile Practice Guide or our own Guide on How to Pick the Software Development Process that’s Right For you. Each chapter ends with quick reviews making this a useful “PMBOK for Dummies”.

2020 148

2020 Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Software Review 148

Teamweek

JANUARY 23, 2024

We witnessed the evolution of many time management apps that claim to solve those problems over the years but that led to the overwhelming choice of software on the market today. We explored all kinds of apps, sifted through user reviews, and tested them to put together this list of the 9 best time management apps for 2024.

2024 59

2024 Software Review 2004 2006 59

Wrike

JUNE 12, 2023

With so much project management software on the market, the choice might seem overwhelming at first. That means you should be sure the work management software you choose is suitable for your organization not only for today, but also for tomorrow — as you grow. But which platform to choose?

Software Review 36

Software Review 2015 Technical Review 2006 36