Scrum.org

AUGUST 25, 2022

The notion of “sustainable pace” is closely tied to Extreme Programming practices. Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2012) provides a great perspective on what creates intrinsic motivation. For example, I (Christiaan) love the thrill of solving a hard coding problem. Closing Words. What is a sustainable pace?

Sustainability 190

Sustainability 2015 2014 2013 190

Binfire

NOVEMBER 7, 2017

Online collaboration software is gaining wide acceptance. The collaboration market is one of the fastest growing markets in the software industry. In fact, by 2012 this market is estimated to be $42.57 Elements of good online collaboration software. A quick review of collaboration software buyer’s guide.

Software Review 92

Software Review Software 2010 Technical Review 92

Rebel’s Guide to PM

AUGUST 6, 2022

And will make the decision to close the project down early if it can no longer meet its objectives. If you are expecting the project oversight committee to make a decision at the meeting, make sure that they have information in advance of your meeting so that they can review the different options. Action review and next steps.

Governance 358

Governance Government Risk Management Technical Review 358

TrustRadius Project Management

MARCH 21, 2020

Research from Gallup found that the percentage of American employees working from home increased from 39% to 43% between 2012 and 2016. Remove Work Software Tools Are Booming Right Now. Unsurprisingly, there has been an incredible increase in the number of software buyers searching for these tools in the wake of Coronavirus.

Software Review 62

Software Review Technical Review Software 2012 62

Moira Alexander

APRIL 24, 2017

Founded by Harvard University and MIT in 2012, edX is one of the biggest MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses) platforms available and offers many project management (PM) courses. Agile Software Development - goes over fundamental agile concepts to enhance your software development skills. Related Video.

Certification 252

Certification Technical Review Lean Software Review 252

Scrum.org

JUNE 1, 2022

And does your Sprint Review consist of team members listing their individual accomplishments? They also tend to perform better (Evans & Dion, 2012), are better able to deal with stress and pressure (Salas, Driskell & Hughes, 1996). Closing words. Psychological review , 57 (5), 271. Human relations , 48 (6), 647–667.

SCRUM 222

SCRUM 2007 2003 2006 222

Rebel’s Guide to PM

MAY 25, 2019

Due to a difference of opinion about planning. Because once the detailed planning is done there may be a need to review scope. Due to changes to scope and at any key decision making point, for example, risk response plans. Conflict Examples in the Handover and Close Phase. Around roles and responsibilities.

Underperforming Technical Team 288

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Risk Management 2012 288

Resource Guru

FEBRUARY 16, 2022

5 steps for seamless project scheduling How project scheduling software keeps projects on track Effective project scheduling supports your team and the bottom line. It’s easy to mix up project planning and project scheduling because they’re such closely linked parts of successful project management. Project team members.

Software Review 98

Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 2012 98

ProjectManager.com

AUGUST 29, 2019

But I do like the reframe that Amy Cuddy offers in her 2012 TED talk , which has garnered of 52 million views, as I write this. And get the distance right too: not so close you intimidate or become intimate, not so far that you are distant. The old and somewhat creepy saying is “fake it till you make it.” I don’t like this.

2012 242

2012 Controlling Software Review Influencer 242

Project Pulse Journal

MARCH 20, 2024

This approach ensures that every aspect of the project management process, from planning and execution to monitoring and closing , is designed to meet the project's unique needs. Regular audits and phase gates help teams review project performance and track progress systematically.

Governance 52

Governance Government Technical Review Software Review 52

International Institute for Learning

APRIL 19, 2023

DA was developed in 2011 by Scott Ambler and Mark Lines and is based on Scott’s work at Rational Software and IBM. Dean Leffingwell released the first version of SAFe in 2012. Disciplined DevOps is the set of process blades enabling the continuous delivery of working software. Interestingly, Dean also worked at Rational.

Agile 59

Agile Cadence Certification Lean 59

Scrum.org

DECEMBER 23, 2021

Why is code quality so often an issue? Why do software teams?—?despite So I was pleasantly surprised when Carsten Grønbejrg Lützen pointed at a peer-reviewed academic paper by Michele Tufano and his colleagues (2015), called “When and Why Your Code Starts To Smell Bad”. Technical Debt and Code Smells.

Software Review 190

Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 2015 190

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. A Critical Review Of Risk Management Support Tools,” Irem Dikmen, M. 5, September/October 2011.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 15, 2018

Some years ago — in 2012 — I experienced my first Professional Scrum Master class. Here was a trainer who was obviously not in it for the money, but was sincerely trying to improve the profession of software development. Although I had been teaching and training Scrum since 2012, it was never as a Professional Scrum Trainer.

SCRUM 132

SCRUM 2012 2018 Software Review 132

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 15, 2018

Some years ago — in 2012 — I experienced my first Professional Scrum Master-class. Here was a trainer who was obviously not in it for the money, but was sincerely trying to improve the profession of software development. Although I had been teaching and training Scrum since 2012, it was never as a Professional Scrum Trainer.

SCRUM 95

SCRUM 2012 2018 Software Review 95

Leading Agile

SEPTEMBER 24, 2018

I frequently read and hear that software developers must take care to deliver the right solutions. I would observe lack of preparation is a cause of poor quality software. It tends to lead people to copy and paste code from StackOverflow. Many developers tell me they don’t want to spend all their spare time writing code.

Software Developers 99

Software Developers Software Development Software Review Software 99

Herding Cats

JULY 24, 2017

Shipping on time, to specifications, and within budget might be meaningless if a competitor is shipping software that has a greater value to the market. It's suggested from observations, the Cone of Uncertainty (CoU) is not a valid model of how uncertainty behaves in software development projects. Cone of Uncertainty - Part Cinq.

2007 42

2007 2012 2006 2008 42

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The naturally occurring work effort in the development of a software feature - even if we've built the feature before - is an irreducible uncertainty. Accuracy - how close is the estimate to the actual value? Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. For our credible.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Leading Agile

JUNE 27, 2018

” I was reminded of the old joke by a recent article by John Regehr, Professor of Computer Science at the University of Utah, entitled “Closing the Loop: The Importance of External Engagement in Computer Science Research.” In 2012, I wrote a blog post entitled “Delivering provably-correct code.”

Software Review 123

Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 2007 123

Herding Cats

JUNE 19, 2017

The Cone of Uncertainty is a framing assumption used to model the needed reduction in some parameter of interest in domains ranging from software development to hurricane forecasting. Closed Loop Stochastic Adaptive control in the presence of Evolving Uncertainty. Thesis, University of Southern California, August 2012.

Technical Review 35

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Estimate 35

Runrun.it

JANUARY 23, 2020

And while 1 in 12 also close within a year, that still leaves the rest with plenty of competition to worry about. . As a mid-sized state run bank, DBS already had its hands full in 2019 due to new fintech startups offering exceedingly competitive solutions to traditional banking. No doubt, the customer is the winner in the end here.

Technical Review 26

Technical Review 2012 Lean Retail 26

Scrum.org

APRIL 7, 2022

Edmondson (2012) argues that dynamic teaming is important to share and encourage learning. This is also what inspired Edmondson (2012) in her academic work on “teaming”. They also tend to perform better (Evans & Dion, 2012), are better able to deal with stress and pressure (Salas, Driskell & Hughes, 1996). Bradley et.

Underperforming Technical Team 175

Underperforming Technical Team 2007 2006 2009 175

Leading Agile

JUNE 18, 2018

Defensive programming consists of learning and using guidelines for software design and coding that tend to minimize the frequency and severity of problems in production. The day came when the software community more-or-less forgot about defensive programming. The Age of the Mainframe. And sleep, too. The Age of the Webapp.

Software Review 101

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Artificial Inteligence 101

Scrum.org

AUGUST 17, 2020

The fallacy happens when we conclude from this that punishment works, and rewards don’t (Defulio, 2012). When comparing different approaches to develop software, survival bias can lead someone to conclude that plan-driven approaches work well based on a few success stories they have where they did. Closing words. Vol 5(1) 2015.

2015 224

2015 2014 2004 Influencer 224

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 15, 2020

If we look at the Stacey Matrix adapted for software development, a complex domain is where there are more unknown variables that cannot be predicted and there is no definite path to reach the goal. In the movie Avengers (2012), The Mind Stone allows the user to control the minds of others and can control what they do.

SCRUM 183

SCRUM Development Team Review 2012 Technical Review 183

Paymo App

FEBRUARY 8, 2018

If you’re here, it means that you’re looking for time tracking software that you will use yourself or with your team. Also, keep a close eye on any special offers from time to time. Reviews: Even though every tool works in distinct ways for each business, you can take a look at what existing users have to say.

2018 75

2018 Software Review Software Technical Review 75

MPUG

MAY 18, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. For those of you who are PMPs, your activity code today is on the screen. I’ll also invite you to stay on after the event and the recording closes.

Agile 59

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Cadence 59

Rebel’s Guide to PM

NOVEMBER 23, 2016

Due to a difference of opinion about planning. Because once the detailed planning is done there may be a need to review scope. Due to changes to scope and at any key decision making point, for example, risk response plans. Handover and Close Phase. Around roles and responsibilities. The project manager and sponsor.

Underperforming Technical Team 150

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 2012 Project Life Cycle 150

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Agile Software Development (#ASD). Enterprise IT and Embedded Systems (#EIT).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

MPUG

APRIL 2, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. For our PMPs joining today, the PMI PDU code is on the screen now. I’m going to close the query panel down. Let me close that down. Melanie: Welcome.

2016 52

2016 Closing Software Review Technical Review 52

MPUG

MARCH 15, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And then we update it and we set it to closed. And if it’s updated, then we just change the project to closed. Jeff started Lynch Interactive in 1999.

Controlling 52

Controlling Initiating Closing Budget 52

PM That Works

APRIL 18, 2020

I was always enamored by Italy, when I when I go to Italy, and how close the families were how they took, you know, the lunch breaks, everything shuts down. r squared has tailored best practices to help you in all areas of project management, visit r squared consulting.com are you getting the most out of your project management software?

Energy 40

Energy 2004 Closing Software Review 40

MPUG

MAY 31, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s PMI activity code is on the screen. In 2012, Mike founded the Excel Trainer where he has produced nearly 200 written and video based Excel tutorials.

Software Review 52

Software Review Controlling Technical Review PMI 52

MPUG

FEBRUARY 18, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. The MPUG Activity Code for claiming that with PMI is on the screen now. Okay, let me close that down. My name is Kyle and I’ll be the moderator today.

Software Review 52

Software Review 2012 Manufacturing 2002 52