The IIL Blog

OCTOBER 24, 2023

AI is a branch of computer science that focuses on providing computer hardware and software with the ability to execute intelligent tasks with Generative AI (GenAI) learning and improving with each query. For over a quarter of a century, the Standish Group has tracked, reported, and improved software-intensive project success rates. [1]

Artificial Inteligence 88

Artificial Inteligence Technical Review ChatGPT Generative AI 88

Proofhub

APRIL 6, 2022

Software as a service has been the fastest-growing segment since 2010, and businesses are now investing 50% more in these cloud-based technologies than they did a couple of years ago. It’s important to use well-informed content to educate your target audience about how the software works and how it can benefit their business.

2022 148

2022 2010 Software Review Technical Review 148

Binfire

AUGUST 20, 2017

The list of Asana alternatives in this article is not exhaustive but a good sample of what is available on the market in 2017. If you have your own favorite Asana alternatives let me know and I will update this article. 2- Binfire – Binfire was founded in 2010 by David Robins. Asana Alternatives.

Software Review 100

Software Review 2006 2010 2012 100

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 5, 2018

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ? This variation can be explained by the fact that initial concepts do not describe the final software system accurate enough.

2012 48

2012 2007 2011 2010 48

The Lazy Project Manager

MAY 5, 2016

Based on my ideas and this feedback I checked out the PMI congresses in EMEA and NA and APAC since 2010 and guess what? This is also the basis for ‘blind’ SME (subject matter expert) review of the submissions. There is no escape from reality now. Yes, lots the same faces turning up year after year.

PMI 150

PMI 2010 2015 2009 150

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 255, April 2010. 24, 2010. “A México, 1 al 3 de Febrero de 2006. 3, March 2002. “The

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 24, 2010. “A

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Proofhub

JULY 6, 2021

this way you make sure that the person this review is aimed at, takes the feedback in a positive light. Hack : Use meeting scheduling software for planning so that meetings don’t show up on everyone’s calendars uninvited. Whether it’s a discussion on the latest news in the company or monthly metrics review?—?agenda

Underperforming Technical Team 78

Underperforming Technical Team 2010 Software Review Executing 78

Project Pulse Journal

APRIL 2, 2024

Dive into this article and uncover the strategies, insights, and actionable steps that will transform the way you manage projects. As more and more project managers utilize software to track progress, project data becomes more available, leading to data consumption within organizations.

Governance 40

Governance Government Influencer Technical Review 40

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The naturally occurring work effort in the development of a software feature - even if we've built the feature before - is an irreducible uncertainty. Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. McMahon, Cross Talk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering , July/August 2015, pp.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

The IIL Blog

JANUARY 10, 2019

I first met Rich Sheridan when we toured Menlo Innovations as part of a career transformation program I was leading in 2010, called “Shifting Gears.” It was one of our first offerings to teach our “Why” (namely, to end human suffering in the world as it relates to technology and return joy to software) and our “How” (i.e.,

Innovation 103

Innovation 2001 2010 Energy 103

Herding Cats

JULY 24, 2017

Shipping on time, to specifications, and within budget might be meaningless if a competitor is shipping software that has a greater value to the market. It's suggested from observations, the Cone of Uncertainty (CoU) is not a valid model of how uncertainty behaves in software development projects. Wallshein, Ph.D. Laird and M.

2007 42

2007 2012 2006 2008 42

nTask

OCTOBER 21, 2021

Obviously, in this fast-paced market, you are never going to perform all of these different processes by hand, and you need an incredibly effective project management software that takes care of these processes and activities for you and your team members. Another great example of a Linux project management software is OpenProject.

Technical Review 179

Technical Review Software Review 2021 Software 179

Herding Cats

APRIL 8, 2017

These systems fall into the Software Intensive System of Systems (SISoS) category. The notion that innovation and engineering - software engineering - are somehow in conflict is common. . In the software engineering domain, like the developer domain, design is the basis of this innovation.

Web Development 37

Web Development Software Engineering Engineering 2010 37

Scrum.org

JUNE 18, 2021

Most of us perceive and interpret a dark alley as a dangerous place due to the potential for robbery, and so we avoid them behaviorally. Butler et al, 2006, Tolin, 2010) are based on this approach (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, CBT). Suppose for a moment that you’re going for a nightly stroll in an unknown city.

2010 180

2010 SCRUM 2006 Software Review 180

Workzone

APRIL 30, 2020

In 2010 daPulse, created by Wix.com , joined the vast array of project management tools on the market, and in 2017, daPulse went through a transformation to become Monday.com. Designed to come across as colorful and friendly, Monday aims to help you kick your case of the Monday blues through the use of its software.

2020 38

2020 Software Review Technical Review Software 38

Rebel’s Guide to PM

JUNE 6, 2022

In this article, I’ll share 5 simple ways to bring more ‘visual’ into your project communications. Many project managers copy and paste milestones out of their Gantt chart and list them as due dates in a project report, perhaps in a table. Screen capture from Alexa.com, 9 September 2021. Hint: Don’t do that.).

2010 440

2010 Software Review Technical Review 2021 440

Herding Cats

JANUARY 22, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. As the program progresses each of the weight measurements for each of the models through to a final article is compared to the planned weight. Software Engineering Economics”.

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

Herding Cats

JANUARY 17, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. As the program progresses each of the weight measurements for each of the models through to a final article is compared to the planned weight. Software Engineering Economics”.

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

Herding Cats

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. As the program progresses each of the weight measurements for each of the models through to a final article is compared to the planned weight. Software Engineering Economics”.

Technical Review 28

Technical Review Estimate 2005 Software Review 28

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 16, 2021

Shall I notify you about articles like this one? From 2010 to 2017, I worked several years in three Berlin-based, fast-growing startups in my capacity as Scrum Master, agile coach, and Product Owner. Fast-growing’ in the sense of this article refers to startups of at least 200 staff strong. Participation is free.).

Agile 125

Agile Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 125

Project Management Hacks

AUGUST 4, 2016

In today’s article, you will hear directly from Leigh Espy about her journey into project management success at FedEx. Through many discussions with my husband – who works in software development – I discovered an interest in the technology field. I led an effort to develop a risk-based software development process.

2013 28

2013 2003 Technical Review 2010 28

MPUG

JULY 17, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Jim is the president of Critical Tools, the makers of WBS Schedule Pro Software. There may be exclusions, such as those steps included in product demonstrations.

Software Review 52

Software Review 2014 Planning Technical Review 52

nTask

AUGUST 8, 2019

This helped us to simplify how nTask project management software can be used for solving such issues. Its simplicity and ease of implementation has made it the most popular version of the systems development life cycle (SDLC) for software engineering and IT projects. Waterfall is a popular SDLC project management model.

Software Review 97

Software Review 2019 Development Team Review Technical Review 97

nTask

MARCH 31, 2021

Freedcamp is a free project management software launched in 2010. The software offers a multitude of features at an inexpensive price. In this article, we will highlight the best Freedcamp alternatives you can start using today. With time tracking software , you can plan and budget your projects. Sign up today!

2021 78

2021 Software Review 2010 Risk Management 78

MPUG

JULY 1, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. PMI PDUs in the technical category and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session was on the screen now. My name is Kyle and I’ll be the moderator today.

Risk Management 52

Risk Management Risk 2016 Underperforming Technical Team 52

Digite

MARCH 12, 2018

Alternatively to the previous: I believe The IT Skeptic had an article about having two boards – one focused on the stakeholder epics, the other on the actual short-term tasks. In my over 25+ years in the software industry, this has been an all too familiar situation! Is it a good idea? Do you have experience with that?

Development Team Review 154

Development Team Review Software Review Cadence Technical Review 154

Wrike

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

Need up-to-date facts and figures for a project management report, article, or infographic? Project Management Software & Tools. Lean & Test Driven Development (TDD) – 11%. Project Management Software & Tools. Most-Wanted Features in Project Management Software: 1. 53% use project management software.

2015 60

2015 Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 60

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 9, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the Technical category, and the MPUG Activity Code for claiming is on the screen now.

Software Review 52

Software Review Critical Chain Technical Review Risk Management 52

MPUG

JUNE 28, 2020

But let’s face facts: Microsoft is in the business of selling software, and they were not going to combine these two! I got to thinking about my history with the MSP the other day, and thought the software’s evolution might be an interesting topic to explore. MSP 2010 was a significant upgrade, and the last to run on Windows XP.

2007 111

2007 2013 2002 2003 111

Resource Guru

AUGUST 10, 2023

We’ve curated a selection of tools based on category and customer reviews. per person per month Master: Starts at $10 per person per month “With the Guru software we get better insights into our daily planning. That said, there’s an abundance of tools for agencies to choose from. per person per month Blackbelt: Starts at $6.65

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review 2010 Closing 52

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to estimate software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Cost Modeling Agile Software Development,” Maarit Laanti and Petri Kettunen, International Transactions on Systems and Applications, Volume 1 Number 2, pp. Performance Evaluation of non?Markovian

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

MPUG

AUGUST 1, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. We do support Project 2010 through 2019, standard or professional editions and we also support 32 and 64 bit. John Owen: Thank you. It’s a very simple project.

Risk 40

Risk Software Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 40

MPUG

JUNE 9, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And then Microsoft added them to Excel in 2010 as miniature charts embedded into Excel. Mike: Three semicolons is a special code which means hide the cell contents.

2010 52

2010 Software Review Technical Review Defining 52

MPUG

JULY 23, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session with PMI is on the screen now.

Risk 52

Risk Software Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

MPUG

JULY 23, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session with PMI is on the screen now.

Risk 52

Risk Software Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

MPUG

OCTOBER 16, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the code for claim that is on the screen now, that’s mpugwebnlearn091819.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Engineering 40