Scrum.org

OCTOBER 19, 2022

So we went to Google Scholar and searched for review articles. 2010) reviewed 28 scientific studies that investigated how Scrum is associated with overall business outcomes. A strength of such a review is that it allows for the identification of patterns across many studies. Journal of systems and software , 81 (6), 961–971.

Agile 200

Agile 2010 2013 2008 200

Digite

MAY 15, 2018

It also encourages everyone to review/adopt the values (in Scrum language) that can help software development teams succeed in building software. People on software development teams, regardless of Scrum or Kanban, will goal set, seek feedback, deliver increments of product, and reflect on how they work.

Development Team Review 93

Development Team Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM 93

International Institute for Learning

JULY 7, 2022

During the last two decades there has been the emergence of a number of software development methods as a response to the inefficiency of existing software development methods in rapidly changing environments (Highsmith, 2004). Creativity in agile systems development: a literature review. By Luigi Morsa.

Innovation 59

Innovation Agile 2002 2001 59

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 30, 2018

There have been some recent posts about managing scope, defining needed Features, determining how to release software to stakeholders - in both traditional and agile processes. This document is all but unknown in the Enterprise IT domain and completely unknown in the agile software development world. Lizotte, C. Nécaille, C.

Planning 109

Planning 2007 Technical Review 2009 109

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ‒ Steve McConnell. Fixed price without fixed specification,” Magne Jørgensen, Simula Research Laboratory, 15 March 2016.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2006 2005 2013 64

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 25, 2020

When I started using Scrum as a software developer back in 2007 I noticed that this new ways of working really worked, then I decided to learn more about and I became a Scrum Master in 2012 and in 2015 I started to teach Scrum, overcoming my fear of public speaking. I will explain the peer review at the end of this article.

2017 172

2017 2018 2016 SCRUM 172

Gunther Verheyen

FEBRUARY 26, 2024

From 2013-2016 I maintained the official “Professional Scrum” series of Scrum.org meanwhile training candidate-PSTs and shepherding the global community of Professional Scrum Trainers and coaches. After ending the exclusivity of Scrum.org over my work in 2016, I had to think about a new title.

SCRUM 74

SCRUM Certification 2016 2011 74

Planio

DECEMBER 4, 2019

And just because you know the steps of the software development lifecycle or how to write a statement of work doesn’t mean you can successfully manage a project. And unlike working with steel, wood, or even code, it’s impossible to know what you’re going to get out of your team each day. When things are due. Leadership.

Underperforming Technical Team 176

Underperforming Technical Team 2019 Software Review Technical Review 176

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. A Critical Review Of Risk Management Support Tools,” Irem Dikmen, M. 3, March 2002. “The

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Teamweek

JUNE 10, 2020

Although it’s seemingly similar to finding a software developer , there are some distinct differences to consider when thinking about how to hire web developers. Let’s find out what makes for a great web developer, what tech skills they should have, where to find them, and how to hire them. What is a web developer?

Web Development 78

Web Development Underperforming Technical Team 2020 Technical Review 78

Scrum.org

SEPTEMBER 3, 2019

A 2018 survey from Harvard Business Review reveals that more than 9 out of 10 empolyees would be willing to trade a percentage of their lifetime earnings for greater meaning at work. In creative work (which would apply to software development), studies have found that after a certain point, money is a demotivator. McLeod, S.A.

Agile 110

Agile 2016 2017 2018 110

International Institute for Learning

JUNE 22, 2022

It is harder to define outputs and assess progress in the service economy or knowledge work—developing software or writing a report. Kanban is a flow-based management practice initially developed to reduce inventory and manufacturing costs. Stakeholders are regularly invited to review accomplishments and provide feedback.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review Software Review Lean PMI 52

ProjectManager.com

AUGUST 28, 2018

Agile has migrated from software development to touch just about every corner of the project management universe, and Scrum is one of the most popular frameworks for implementing it. In 2016, the Scrum Values were added to the Scrum Guide. These values include courage, focus, commitment, respect and openness.

SCRUM 118

SCRUM Development Team Review 2016 Agile 118

International Institute for Learning

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

The risk with larger teams is that they can be more vulnerable to poor communication, fragmentation, and free riding due to a lack of accountability [3]. Martine Haas and Mark Mortensen, “The Secrets of Great Teamwork”, Harvard Business Review, June 2016. This alone is a good reason to pay attention to the two-pizza rule [5].

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team 2022 Technical Review 2002 52

LiquidPlanner

JULY 13, 2016

A traditional PMO is a top-down command structure for delivering software projects. A digital business does away with that age-old power structure and even lets business units manage their software development projects without IT assistance. I’ve reviewed some of these apps and DIY app development tools in the past for clients.

Development Team Review 94

Development Team Review PMO Finance Technical Review 94

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 24, 2018

But before going further, let's establish the definitions we need to understand and apply Root Cause Analysis needed to discover the corrective and preventive actions to increase the probability of project success - especially Software Project Success. What factors lead to software project failure?” All for the want of a nail.

2014 45

2014 Aerospace 2011 2013 45

Digite

MARCH 1, 2017

However, I had not seen Kanban being applied to software development, project management, etc. Around the same time, I was fortunate enough get to attend the Lean Kanban India 2016 conference (LKIN) and listening to David J Anderson and other thought-leaders. We review our work with the Head of Marketing on twice-a-week basis.

Software Review 60

Software Review Lean Cadence Engineering 60

Gunther Verheyen

DECEMBER 19, 2018

In July 2016 they were added to the Scrum Guide. More and different people look for guidance and insights on their journey of Scrum, increasingly in domains beyond software development. I thank Blake McMillan and Dominik Maximini for their much-appreciated review of this second edition. The Scrum Glossary was updated.

SCRUM 77

SCRUM 2013 2016 2017 77

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The naturally occurring work effort in the development of a software feature - even if we've built the feature before - is an irreducible uncertainty. Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. Nord, CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering , May/June 2013.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

LiquidPlanner

OCTOBER 21, 2016

Why Big Firms Are More Likely to Innovate – Harvard Business Review. What You Need to Know About Robot Software Developers – Small Business Trends. This article looks at how and why software teams are leveraging a process called continuous delivery. The Most Innovative Companies of 2016 – Fast Company.

Innovation 60

Innovation 2016 Technical Review Software Review 60

Teamweek

JANUARY 23, 2020

In their words: Get better at modelling & designing software for complex domains. In their words: DevOpsDays is a worldwide series of community run technical conferences covering topics of software development, IT infrastructure operations, and the intersection between them. Starting at $270. Domain Driven Design.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review 2020 Artificial Inteligence Software Review 52

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Agile Software Development (#ASD). Enterprise IT and Embedded Systems (#EIT).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Governance 42

PM Basics

OCTOBER 26, 2020

In addition, you can get a simple template I developed and used throughout 10 years as a software development project manager. An investigation was conducted to develop performance requirements and a new vision of the UI. The purpose of this project is to develop a new design and implement a brand new site.

Software Review 52

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Risk Management Project Life Cycle 52

LiquidPlanner

NOVEMBER 2, 2017

While Abeid hasn’t released a new podcast since 2016, the archives are still worth exploring. Cost: Coursera: Agile Development Specialization. This course provides a beginner overview of the Agile methodology, specifically within software projects. Harvard Business Review. Cost: $6,570. Format: Online; classroom.

Technical Review 113

Technical Review 2018 Underperforming Technical Team Certification 113

Planio

JULY 22, 2020

The Culture Code: The Secrets of Highly Successful Groups. If you’re also interested in Agile project management, pair the PMBOK with the PMI’s new Agile Practice Guide or our own Guide on How to Pick the Software Development Process that’s Right For you. Author: Harvard Business Review. Author: Brett Harned.

2020 148

2020 Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Software Review 148

MPUG

MAY 6, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI, PDU in the technical category, and the code for claiming that with PMI is on the screen now.

Performance Measurement 52

Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Governance 52

PM Basics

FEBRUARY 14, 2018

Deloitte’s 2016 Global Outsourcing Survey). Many of the best practices and leadership approaches and styles need to be reviewed beforehand. Context: Directly managing resources in software development and delivery. Relax: it’s a good moment to review and focus on your behavior: take advantage of it.

Leadership 66

Leadership Technical Review Influencer Software Review 66

Paymo App

JANUARY 19, 2018

Tools for project managers – collaboration tools, video chat systems, project management software, and all the apps that you need to start a project. Don’t worry though, you don’t need to be an expert in technical skills such as coding. develop a detailed project plan to track project progress.

2018 111

2018 Prince2 Certification Technical Review 111

MPUG

MAY 24, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. The MPUG activity code for claiming the session is on the screen now. So this is the first one that we are going to be reviewing today. Raphael Santos: All right.

Software Review 40

Software Review Artificial Inteligence Software Developers Software Development 40

MPUG

NOVEMBER 4, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. MPUG activity code for claiming the session in on the screen now. Jigs Gaton: So, what software tools? My name is Kyle and I’ll be the moderator today.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review Risk Management 52

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category and the code for claiming today’s session is on the screen now.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40

Leading Agile

OCTOBER 1, 2018

Mike Cohn’s August 2016 article, The Dangers of a Definition of Ready describes certain problems that can occur when a team uses the concept of a Definition of Ready. Below I review the LeadingAgile Compass model to try and provide context around Definition of Ready. It’s already established. They have no hard hand-offs.

Software Review 85

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Infrastructure 85

MPUG

NOVEMBER 14, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And you get asked a question to enter a code. And this code is 18 11 17. There may be exclusions, such as those steps included in product demonstrations.

2013 40

2013 Finance 2007 Software Review 40

Leading Agile

OCTOBER 24, 2018

89% /'" echo 'no mail' > mailsent # Run code under test (act)./diskusage.sh shunit2 displays test results, so we don’t need the code at the end of our script to display the test output, where the comment reads, “Display test results” We’ll remove that. echo "$tcnt. echo "$tcnt.

Software Review 68

Software Review 2016 Application Development Software Developers 68